Car Collector Fails in Bid for $122k Insurance Windfall

The dispute began when the owner's 2005 HSV Coupe GTO Z Series succumbed to flames in March of the previous year. RACQ Insurance accepted the total loss and initially valued the vehicle at $68,000.

However, the unsatisfied owner declined this offer, leading to an independent valuation which described the car as being in “good condition for its age and mileage” despite its 315,000km on the odometer.

Although comparable lower-mileage vehicles were advertised above $81,000, the heavy usage severely reduced its collectible appeal, the independent valuer noted. Conclusively, the evaluator deemed the insurer's offer reasonable.

The car owner contested this, alleging RACQ Insurance's assessment was flawed, particularly regarding the engine type and the car's rarity as one of only 60 manual transmission models, asserting its condition was excellent.

In response, RACQ revised their offer to $78,000 factoring in the vehicle's unique modifications and reconditioned engine, but the claimant stood firm in his refusal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), upon review, sided with the insurer. AFCA deemed RACQ Insurance's valuation and the independent assessment to be “logical, well-considered and helpful.”

According to Glass's Guide referenced by the AFCA, the vehicle's maximum estimated market value could not exceed $58,100, considering its age and mileage. Although rare, evidence was insufficient to justify a $200,000 evaluation.

The AFCA stated, “The complainant has not provided persuasive evidence to demonstrate the vehicle's worth is beyond what the insurer offered. Under such conditions, adjusting the settlement upward would not be justifiable.”

Reference: Original findings from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority's ruling were sourced from RACQ Insurance's appeal letter. Read more about the decision here.

Published:Wednesday, 24th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Understanding the Impact of NSW's Landmark Court Decision on Construction Liability 26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In January 2026, a pivotal ruling by the New South Wales Court of Appeal in the Pafburn case has significantly altered the landscape of construction liability, with profound implications for builders and developers across the state. This decision, coupled with amendments to the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (DBP Act), necessitates a thorough reassessment of risk management and insurance strategies within the construction industry. - read more

Competitive Pressures Lead to Lower Construction Insurance Premiums in Australia 26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In 2025, Australia's construction insurance market experienced a significant shift, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to intensified competition among insurers. This development marks a departure from the upward trend observed in previous years, offering a more favourable environment for builders and developers seeking coverage. - read more

The Growing Challenge of Underinsurance Amid Rising Home Insurance Costs in Australia 26 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori Australian homeowners are facing a growing challenge as rising home insurance premiums contribute to a widening protection gap. This trend is leading to an increasing number of households being underinsured or entirely without insurance, exposing them to significant financial risks in the event of disasters or property damage. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates 25 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In the final quarter of 2025, Australian commercial insurance rates experienced a substantial decline of 12%, marking the most significant drop among the eight regions monitored by Marsh Risk's Global Insurance Market Index. This trend reflects a broader pattern of decreasing rates that began in early 2024, with the Pacific region, predominantly Australia, leading the way. - read more