Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Europ Assistance Australia Now Underwrites Its Own Travel Insurance Policies 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Europ Assistance Australia (EAA) has achieved a significant milestone by obtaining a general insurance licence from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This development allows EAA to underwrite its own travel insurance products, marking a new chapter in its commitment to Australian travellers. - read more

RACV Highlights Risks of Last-Minute Travel Insurance Purchases 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Recent insights from the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) reveal a concerning trend among Australian travellers: 35% are purchasing travel insurance within seven days of departure, with 5% waiting until the day they leave. This last-minute approach can lead to significant gaps in coverage and benefits. - read more

Allianz Partners Highlights Risks of Travelling Uninsured for Australians 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Allianz Partners is calling on Australian travellers to reassess their approach to travel insurance, following research revealing that 14% of Australians embark on overseas trips without any coverage. This statistic is even more pronounced among younger travellers under 30, with 23% travelling uninsured. - read more

Surge in Insurance Complaints Highlights Industry Challenges 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Recent data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reveals a significant increase in consumer complaints against insurance companies, reaching an unprecedented average of 100 complaints per day. This surge is primarily attributed to delays in processing routine claims, rather than issues arising from natural disasters. - read more