Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.
Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.
AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.
The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.
Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.
The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.
“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.
Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.
For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.
Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Heightened Road Risks During Holiday Season Due to Increased Freight Traffic 25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori As Australia enters the summer holiday season, insurers and transport specialists are raising alarms about heightened road risks resulting from the convergence of increased freight activity and holiday travel. This period sees a significant uptick in both passenger vehicles and heavy trucks on the roads, amplifying the potential for accidents and safety incidents. - read more |
| Celebrating Excellence: 2025 National Trucking Industry Award Winners 25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Trucking Association (ATA) has proudly announced the recipients of the 2025 National Trucking Industry Awards, recognizing outstanding contributions and achievements within the sector. These awards highlight the dedication and excellence of individuals and organizations that drive the industry forward. - read more |
| Premiums Decline in Australian Construction Insurance Market 25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Australia's construction insurance market has entered a softer phase in 2025, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to heightened competition among insurers. According to Marsh's Construction Insurance Market Update 2025, premium reductions averaged between 5% and 15% in the first half of the year. - read more |
| Labour Shortages and Supply Chain Issues Elevate Insurance Claims Costs 25 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In 2025, Australia's insurance industry is grappling with rising claims costs, particularly within the construction sector, due to labour shortages and supply chain disruptions. Crawford & Company's latest Claims Inflation Update highlights that construction expenses are increasing at a rate faster than general consumer prices, with the Building Cost Index (BCI) rising nearly 5% annually. - read more |
| How to Prepare Financially for Unexpected Sickness Life is full of surprises, and unfortunately, not all of them are pleasant. Unexpected sickness can strike anyone at any time, and when it does, it can have a significant impact on your income. Whether it’s a sudden illness, a chronic condition, or an accident, the loss of income can add stress to an already difficult situation. - read more
|
| Loss of income insurance: Case Study Rebecca is a single, self-employed graphic designer who works from home. Aged in her mid-30s, she has monthly commitments of a mortgage and car payments and the usual living expenses. - read more
|
| Why Every Australian Needs Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is designed to provide financial support if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income, allowing you to cover your living expenses and maintain your standard of living during difficult times. - read more
|
| Benefit and Wailting Periods: Choosing the Right Combination for Maximum Protection and Value In Australia, income protection insurance stands as a vital safeguard for professionals, ensuring security during times of unexpected illness or injury. It acts as a financial buffer, providing a percentage of your regular income, so you can maintain your lifestyle without the stress of lost earnings. - read more
|
A very broad term for insurance covering liability exposures for individuals and business owners. It provides broad coverage, generally including all exposures for property damage and bodily injury.