Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.
Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.
AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.
The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.
Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.
The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.
“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.
Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.
For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.
Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| AFCA Criticises TAL for Unfair Termination of Income Protection Benefits 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled against TAL, a prominent life insurer, for terminating a policyholder's income protection benefits without prior notice. This decision underscores the critical importance of procedural fairness in the management of insurance claims. - read more |
| Actuaries Institute Highlights Financial Strain of Mental Illness on Insurance Systems 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Actuaries Institute has issued a call for immediate action to address the escalating financial strain that mental illness is placing on Australia's insurance and compensation systems. This appeal underscores the pressing need to ensure the sustainability of the nation's financial safety net in the face of increasing mental health-related claims. - read more |
| Fitch Ratings Anticipates Continued Premium Increases in Australian Insurance Sector 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Fitch Ratings has projected that Australian insurers will continue to implement premium increases, with gross written premiums expected to grow by mid to high single digits. This forecast is driven by the need to offset rising claims and increased allowances for natural hazards. - read more |
| Surge in Cyber Insurance Adoption Among Australian Businesses 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In the past year, BizCover, a leading small business insurance provider, has reported an almost 50% rise in sales of cyber liability insurance. This significant uptick underscores the escalating awareness and concern among Australian businesses regarding cyber threats. - read more |
| Life Insurance for Millennials: Why It's Essential. As a millennial, you may believe that you're young, healthy, and have plenty of time to prepare for the future. However, it's essential to understand that life is unpredictable, and unexpected events can occur at any time. This is why it's essential to consider life insurance, particularly if you have financial responsibilities, dependents, or both. - read more
|
| The Role of Health Insurance in Supporting Preventive Care Preventive healthcare refers to measures taken to prevent diseases, rather than treating them after they occur. This includes actions like regular health screenings, vaccinations, and adopting healthy lifestyle practices. - read more
|
| The Savvy Consumer’s Guide to Purchasing Life Insurance in Australia As the landscape of finance and personal security evolves in Australia, the importance of being insured has never been more prominent. In a world of changing family dynamics, economic pressures, and higher living costs, life insurance stands as a bastion of support ensuring the well-being of loved ones in the event of unforeseen circumstances. The advent of the digital age has significantly shifted the manner in which Australians can shop for and secure life insurance from the comfort of their homes, offering tailored solutions with just a few clicks. - read more
|
| 5 Tips to Save on Health Cover as an Australian Senior Finding the right health insurance coverage is a critical concern for Australian seniors, who often face the dual challenge of managing chronic health conditions and maintaining financial stability in retirement. As the cost of healthcare continues to rise, the importance of securing an affordable health cover that still meets their needs cannot be overstated. - read more
|
Specific conditions or circumstances for which the insurance policy does not provide coverage.