Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.
Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.
AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.
The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.
Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.
The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.
“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.
Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.
For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.
Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Strata Communities Endorse Call for Enhanced Resilience Reforms 15 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Strata communities are at the forefront of Australia's resilience battle, facing escalating costs, declining coverage, and prolonged recovery periods following disasters. Strata Community Association Australasia (SCA) has expressed strong support for the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA) recent call for coordinated, long-term resilience reforms to protect communities from these challenges. - read more |
| Artificial Intelligence Revolutionises Australian Insurance Sector 15 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian insurance industry is undergoing a significant transformation, with companies increasingly integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into their operations. This shift aims to enhance efficiency, improve customer service, and strengthen risk management practices in a rapidly evolving market. - read more |
| Australian Insurers Confront Financial Risks Amid Climate Change 15 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Climate change is increasingly impacting the Australian insurance industry, presenting significant financial risks as the frequency and severity of natural disasters escalate. Insurers are grappling with the challenge of adapting to this new reality while maintaining financial stability and providing affordable coverage to consumers. - read more |
| Budget Direct Triumphs as 2026 Insurer of the Year 15 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Budget Direct has been honoured with the inaugural 'Insurer of the Year' title at the 2026 Finder Provider of the Year Awards, marking a significant achievement in the Australian insurance sector. This accolade underscores the company's commitment to delivering exceptional value and service to its customers. - read more |
| Comparing Income Protection Policies: What Australians Should Look For Income protection insurance serves as a financial safety net for countless Australians, offering a replacement income when unforeseen circumstances such as illness or injury impede their ability to earn. For the self-employed and entrepreneurs who may not have the safety nets offered by corporate employment, such protection is particularly important. - read more
|
| What Hospitality Business Owners Need to Know About Income Protection Insurance The Australian hospitality industry is renowned for its vibrancy, yet it also faces significant challenges. With fluctuating demand, seasonal changes, and unpredictable external factors such as economic downturns and pandemics, hospitality businesses often operate in a high-risk environment. For hotel operators, the stakes are even higher due to substantial investments in property, staff, and customer service. - read more
|
| Income Protection Insurance vs. Life Insurance: What's the Difference? Insurance is a crucial aspect of financial planning, offering protection against unexpected events that can have significant financial impacts. Among the various insurance options available, two prominent types are Income Protection Insurance and Life Insurance. - read more
|
| Affordable Health Insurance: How to Find the Best Plan for You Affordable health insurance refers to insurance plans that offer necessary health coverage at a price within one's financial means. These plans aim to balance cost with the quality of care, providing essential services without excessive financial burden. The goal is to make healthcare accessible to a wider population, ensuring that everyone can maintain their health without going into debt. - read more
|
the amount that an insured is required to contribute toward an insurance claim as stipulated in an insurance policy. Otherwise known as the "policy excess".