The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.
Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.
AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.
The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.
Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.
The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.
“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.
Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.
For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.
Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| AFCA Criticises TAL for Unfair Termination of Income Protection Benefits 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled against TAL, a prominent life insurer, for terminating a policyholder's income protection benefits without prior notice. This decision underscores the critical importance of procedural fairness in the management of insurance claims. - read more |
| Actuaries Institute Highlights Financial Strain of Mental Illness on Insurance Systems 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Actuaries Institute has issued a call for immediate action to address the escalating financial strain that mental illness is placing on Australia's insurance and compensation systems. This appeal underscores the pressing need to ensure the sustainability of the nation's financial safety net in the face of increasing mental health-related claims. - read more |
| Fitch Ratings Anticipates Continued Premium Increases in Australian Insurance Sector 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Fitch Ratings has projected that Australian insurers will continue to implement premium increases, with gross written premiums expected to grow by mid to high single digits. This forecast is driven by the need to offset rising claims and increased allowances for natural hazards. - read more |
| Surge in Cyber Insurance Adoption Among Australian Businesses 16 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In the past year, BizCover, a leading small business insurance provider, has reported an almost 50% rise in sales of cyber liability insurance. This significant uptick underscores the escalating awareness and concern among Australian businesses regarding cyber threats. - read more |
| Common Misconceptions About Income Protection Insurance Explained Income protection insurance is a crucial financial safeguard for anyone who relies on their salary to pay the bills. It provides a substitute income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury, ensuring that your financial obligations can still be met when you're not able to earn your usual wage. - read more
|
| The Devil's in the Detail: What Your Income Protection Policy Really Covers In today's ever-fluctuating economic landscape, income protection insurance emerges as a vital component of comprehensive financial planning. While many understand the significance of insuring assets like homes and automobiles, securing one's income stream often gets overlooked. However, considering the life's unpredictable nature, safeguarding our ability to earn should be of utmost importance. - read more
|
| Family Planning: Exploring Life Insurance Options for New Parents Stepping into parenthood comes with a myriad of responsibilities, one of which includes securing your family's financial future. Life insurance serves as a financial cornerstone for young professionals who are navigating the complexities of family planning. Recognizing the significance of the role insurance plays can empower new parents to make informed decisions that corroborate their family's safety and well-being. - read more
|
| The Importance of Disability Insurance in a Freelancing World Freelancing in Australia has witnessed exponential growth over the past few years. With the rise of the gig economy, more individuals are enjoying the flexibility and independence that come with being their own boss. From digital marketers to graphic designers, Australians are seizing various freelancing opportunities, embracing the freedom of working on projects that align with their passions. - read more
|