Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

10

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

RBA Holds Cash Rate at 3.60%, Forecasts Extended Stability 10 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has announced its decision to maintain the official cash rate at 3.60% during its December meeting, signaling a potential extended hold through 2026. This move comes in response to higher-than-expected inflation rates and a robust economic performance. - read more

ANZ CEO Nuno Matos Takes Helm at Australian Banking Association 10 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Banking Association (ABA) has appointed Nuno Matos, CEO of ANZ Group, as the new chair of its council, succeeding National Australia Bank's Andrew Irvine. This leadership change marks a significant moment for the ABA, which plays a pivotal role in shaping industry policies and consumer protections within Australia's banking sector. - read more

IAG Highlights Climate Change's Impact on Rising Home Insurance Costs 10 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Insurance Australia Group (IAG) has issued a warning to Australian homeowners about the escalating impact of climate change on home insurance premiums. The insurer attributes the rising costs to the increasing frequency and severity of weather events, such as storms and hailstorms, particularly affecting densely populated regions in southern Australia. - read more

Call for Enhanced Support for Indigenous Insurance Customers 09 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has identified significant gaps in support for Indigenous customers within the insurance sector, following an audit of three major insurers representing two-thirds of the market. The analysis reveals that these insurers lack adequate procedures for safe self-identification, a critical step towards ensuring cultural inclusivity and accessibility. - read more