Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Federal Court Denies Truck Driver's Insurance Appeal 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In a recent legal development, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed an appeal by Bradley Henschke, a logging truck driver, concerning his insurance claim against the Australian Retirement Trust. The court's decision, delivered on February 12, 2026, underscores the critical importance of active insurance coverage for workers in high-risk occupations. - read more

Heightened Road Risks Amid Holiday Freight Traffic Surge 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian summer holidays approach, insurers and transport specialists are raising alarms about increased road risks due to the convergence of peak freight activity and heightened passenger vehicle travel. This period traditionally sees a surge in both freight movements and family road trips, leading to congested roads and a higher potential for accidents. - read more

InfoAgent Launches Advanced Vehicle Data Services for Heavy Trucks 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Australian vehicle data provider InfoAgent has unveiled two innovative services designed to deliver accurate and detailed information for heavy commercial trucks and trailers. These services aim to address critical challenges in industries such as insurance, roadside assistance, fleet management, and logistics by simplifying processes and enabling better decision-making. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums: A Growing Concern for Australians 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In recent times, Australian consumers have been grappling with substantial increases in insurance premiums, prompting widespread concern and scrutiny. Reports indicate that some policyholders have experienced premium hikes ranging from 30% to 50%, with certain cases witnessing even more significant surges. This trend has raised questions about the affordability and transparency of insurance pricing in the country. - read more