Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts
The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.
Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.
AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.
The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.
Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.
The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.
“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.
Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.
For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.
Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Australian Food Super Implements Age-Based Insurance Premium Structure 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Australian Food Super has announced a transition to age-based pricing for its insurance offerings, a move that will see premium costs vary according to members' age brackets. Effective November 1, 2025, this change aims to align insurance costs more closely with the risk profiles associated with different age groups. - read more |
| Australian Life and Income Protection Insurance Premiums Experience Notable Decline 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Recent research from Rainmaker Information indicates a significant decrease in life and income protection insurance premiums across Australia. Direct life premiums have fallen by 7% since 2024, while direct income protection premiums have seen reductions of 12% and 13% for policies with 30-day and 90-day waiting periods, respectively. - read more |
| Global Insurtech Funding Sees Significant Decline Amid AI Surge 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The global insurtech sector experienced a notable downturn in funding during the fourth quarter of 2024, with total investments halving to $US688.24 million compared to the previous quarter. This decline marks the lowest annual funding level since 2018, according to data from Gallagher Re. - read more |
| Australian Insurance Industry Set for Significant Growth Amid Rising Natural Disasters 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory for substantial growth, with direct written premiums (DWP) projected to exceed $144 billion by 2029. This forecast, provided by data and analytics firm GlobalData, reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) driven by increasing demand for coverage in response to the rising frequency of natural disasters. - read more |
| Understanding Various Life Insurance Types: Which One is Right for You? Financial security is one of the most important aspects of modern family life. Ensuring that loved ones are protected and well-supported in the event of an untimely death is a fundamental concern for many Australians. - read more
|
| Common Mistakes to Avoid When Comparing Life Insurance Policies Choosing the right life insurance policy is one of the most important decisions for Australians, especially for those who are middle-aged or older. Life insurance provides financial security for your loved ones in the event of your passing, ensuring that they are not burdened with financial hardships. - read more
|
| Dispelling the Myths: Why Income Protection is More Accessible Than You Think Income protection insurance serves as a financial safety net, designed to support individuals in the event that they are unable to work due to illness or injury. The significance of this type of insurance lies in its ability to provide a continuation of income during tough times, ensuring that one's financial responsibilities are taken care of. - read more
|
| Understanding Income Protection Insurance: A Beginner's Guide for Australians Welcome to the essential guide on Income Protection Insurance for Australians. Whether you're just starting out in the workforce or you're well into your career, understanding how to protect your income is crucial. In this beginner-friendly article, we'll explore what income protection insurance is, why it's a vital safeguard for workers, and dive into some real-life scenarios illustrating its importance. - read more
|
A legal principle that stipulates that insurance policies should restore the insured to the financial position they were in before the loss.