Insurers Ordered to Compensate Despite Theft Claim Doubts

10

The policyholder filed a claim two days after her vehicle was reported stolen on March 23, 2022. She recounted purchasing the car from a friend, who is a certified motor mechanic, and leaving it at their house for servicing.

Insurance Manufacturers of Australia had raised numerous concerns about the circumstances surrounding the theft. These included a lack of proof of purchase and incomplete information about the vehicle's service history. The car was insured despite the new owner not driving it, which also raised suspicions. In addition, the friend did not cooperate with the insurer’s inquiries.

AFCA responded by stating that it is common for individuals to not have a purchase receipt when buying a vehicle privately. They accepted the bank statements showing a $35,000 transaction labeled "AA-Van" as adequate evidence of payment. They also acknowledged that service history details may have been in the vehicle at the time of theft.

The ruling emphasized that purchasing insurance was logical as it included coverage for non-driving events such as theft. While cooperation from the mechanic friend would have aided the investigation, it was not deemed a sufficient reason to reject the claim.

Concerns were also raised by the insurer about why the car remained with the friend for over nine months and inconsistencies in the car’s documented compliance and build dates. AFCA found no definitive reason for the extended storage but accepted explanations, such as Melbourne's lockdown and the complainant’s husband's health issues, as plausible.

The authority acknowledged a confusing situation regarding date inconsistencies but noted that the vehicle identification number (VIN) was consistent across documentation, thus confirming ownership and associated loss.

“Although it seems unlikely that a certified motor vehicle tester would make an error in the build date, it’s not an implausible mistake to make,” commented AFCA’s adjudicator.

Given all evidence, AFCA concluded that the complainant should be recognized as the owner who suffered a financial loss, and they instructed Insurance Manufacturers of Australia to accept the claim and process the payout.

For more details on the original case and ruling, refer to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s documentation.

Published:Monday, 29th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Australian General Insurers Report Record $7.3 Billion Profit 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance sector has reported a remarkable after-tax profit of $7.3 billion for the last financial year, marking its most substantial earnings in over ten years. This significant increase is primarily attributed to a decrease in catastrophe-related losses and robust investment returns. - read more

Australian General Insurance Premiums Set to Surpass $144 Billion by 2029 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance market is on a trajectory to see direct written premiums (DWP) exceed $144 billion by 2029, according to projections from data and analytics firm GlobalData. This anticipated growth is largely fueled by heightened demand for coverage in response to the increasing frequency of natural disasters. - read more

Understanding the Impact of New Regulations on Cosmetic Nurses' Insurance 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The cosmetic nursing sector in Australia has experienced significant growth, driven by increasing demand for non-surgical cosmetic procedures such as injectables and skin treatments. This expansion has led to heightened scrutiny and the introduction of new regulations aimed at ensuring patient safety and professional accountability. - read more

Health Minister Addresses Insurers' Use of Loopholes to Raise Premiums 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In December 2024, Australian Health Minister Mark Butler issued a stern warning to private health insurers regarding the use of 'underhanded' tactics to raise premiums. This statement came in response to findings that some insurers have been closing old policies and introducing more expensive ones, effectively increasing costs for consumers without transparent communication. - read more