Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Regulatory Review of Life Insurance Premium Practices in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In June 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) provided an update on their joint review of life insurance premium practices. This initiative was prompted by concerns over frequent and substantial premium increases that may not align with policy terms or policyholder expectations. - read more |
| Ongoing Deficiencies in Direct Life Insurance Sales Practices Identified by ASIC 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In August 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released findings from a review of direct life insurance sales practices, uncovering persistent deficiencies despite previous regulatory interventions. - read more |
| Swiss Re Suspends New Life Insurance Operations in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Swiss Re Life & Health Australia has announced a suspension of new life insurance business activities in the country, effective October 2025. This decision stems from concerns over the sustainability of Total Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance products, which have seen a significant rise in claims, particularly related to mental health. - read more |
| AIA Australia Highlights Need for Structural Reform in Life Insurance 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Damien Mu, CEO of AIA Australia, has raised concerns about the sustainability of the current life insurance model, citing a significant increase in mental health claims and economic volatility. Speaking at the company's recent Thrive for Life presentation, Mu emphasised that the industry is facing structural changes driven by these factors. - read more |
| Understanding Various Life Insurance Types: Which One is Right for You? Financial security is one of the most important aspects of modern family life. Ensuring that loved ones are protected and well-supported in the event of an untimely death is a fundamental concern for many Australians. - read more
|
| Income Safety Net: How to Choose the Right Income Protection for Your Lifestyle In the face of life's unpredictable twists and turns, few things are as disconcerting as the possibility of suddenly losing your ability to earn an income due to illness. Such events are often unexpected and can have significant financial repercussions that interrupt not only your flow of daily life but also compromise your future plans. - read more
|
| A Guide to the Australian Income Protection Insurance Landscape Income protection insurance stands as an unsung hero in the tapestry of financial security, often overlooked but irreplaceable in its role. Designed to provide a safety net, it ensures that individuals can continue to receive a portion of their income should they become unable to work due to illness or injury. It’s about peace of mind, knowing that life's unforeseen events won't sweep the ground from beneath you. - read more
|
| How Pre-Existing Conditions Affect Your Income Protection Insurance Options Income protection insurance is a type of insurance policy designed to provide you with a continuous flow of income in case you are unable to work due to illness or injury. It's a safety net that helps ensure you can maintain your standard of living, even when unforeseen health issues arise. - read more
|
The amount it would cost to replace or rebuild an insured asset with one of similar kind and quality, without depreciation.