The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Australian Food Super Implements Age-Based Insurance Premium Structure 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Australian Food Super has announced a transition to age-based pricing for its insurance offerings, a move that will see premium costs vary according to members' age brackets. Effective November 1, 2025, this change aims to align insurance costs more closely with the risk profiles associated with different age groups. - read more |
| Australian Life and Income Protection Insurance Premiums Experience Notable Decline 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Recent research from Rainmaker Information indicates a significant decrease in life and income protection insurance premiums across Australia. Direct life premiums have fallen by 7% since 2024, while direct income protection premiums have seen reductions of 12% and 13% for policies with 30-day and 90-day waiting periods, respectively. - read more |
| Global Insurtech Funding Sees Significant Decline Amid AI Surge 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The global insurtech sector experienced a notable downturn in funding during the fourth quarter of 2024, with total investments halving to $US688.24 million compared to the previous quarter. This decline marks the lowest annual funding level since 2018, according to data from Gallagher Re. - read more |
| Australian Insurance Industry Set for Significant Growth Amid Rising Natural Disasters 03 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance industry is on a trajectory for substantial growth, with direct written premiums (DWP) projected to exceed $144 billion by 2029. This forecast, provided by data and analytics firm GlobalData, reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) driven by increasing demand for coverage in response to the rising frequency of natural disasters. - read more |
| Avoiding Overinsurance: How to Choose Adequate Coverage Without Wasting Money Income protection insurance is a key component of financial planning that safeguards your earning potential in the untimely event of illness or injury. In Australia, it reassures individuals that their most valuable asset, the ability to earn, is shielded against unforeseen circumstances. Adequate income protection can provide peace of mind, with the security of a regular income even when you're unable to work. - read more
|
| Creating a Financial Safety Net: Insurance and Savings Tips for Young Families Welcome to our blog! For young families, securing your future often requires careful planning and prudent financial decisions. One of the most crucial steps you can take in this journey is creating a financial safety net. - read more
|
| Top Insurance Policies Every Working Adult Should Consider Insurance is an essential component of achieving financial stability. In life, unexpected events such as illnesses or accidents can pose serious financial challenges. Without adequate preparation, these can disrupt your finances significantly, making recovery even more complicated. This is where the crucial role of insurance becomes apparent. - read more
|
| From Illness to Injury: Understanding the Scope of Income Protection Insurance In the uncertain times we face today, where both health and economic climates are unpredictable, safeguarding your financial stability becomes paramount. This is where income protection insurance steps in as an essential safety net. For many Australian families, it's the buffer that ensures life's financial commitments are met, even when ability to work is compromised. - read more
|