The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Insurance Crunch: Broadening Underinsurance Dilemma 26 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori The risk landscape for homeowners in Australia is shifting, with increasing concerns over the trend of underinsurance. Financial Services Minister, Stephen Jones, highlighted this issue while addressing the National Insurance Brokers Association Convention in Adelaide recently. - read more |
ASIC Challenges QBE Over Discount Discrepancies 24 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori In a significant development, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against QBE Insurance Group. The move comes over what ASIC describes as serious issues with pricing discounts offered by the insurer that may have impacted over half a million policyholders. - read more |
Transformation Needed in Life Insurance Sector for Customer Satisfaction 23 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori Insurance companies in Australia and other developed economies are grappling with meeting the evolving demands of clients, reveals a recent report by Capgemini. - read more |
Insurance Industry Arms with AI to Outpace Scams 17 Oct 2024: Paige Estritori In an evolving battle against growing fraud, the insurance sector is turning to advanced technology as a solution. Despite the continuous advancements in fraud prevention, the creativity of scammers puts pressure on insurers to leverage smarter resources. - read more |
Life Insurance and Estate Planning: What You Need to Know Life insurance and estate planning are critical components of financial security. They ensure that your loved ones are protected financially when you are no longer around. By understanding these tools, you can take significant steps to secure your family's future. - read more
|
Why Income Protection Insurance is Essential for Self-Employed Australians Income protection insurance is a type of coverage designed to provide you with a steady income if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. Unlike other types of insurance, which may focus on lump-sum payments, income protection insurance prioritises regular income replacement to help cover your everyday expenses. - read more
|
Life Insurance Audit: Regular Check-Ups for Your Policy's Health Life insurance serves as a crucial safety net, guarding your loved ones against the unforeseen. Just as you would take care of your health through regular check-ups, it is equally important to ensure that your life insurance policy remains in sound condition to provide the necessary protection. - read more
|
How Much Life Insurance Do You Truly Need? Assessing Your Personal Coverage There's often confusion surrounding the amount of life insurance one truly needs. Common misconceptions cloud our judgment, leading some to undervalue their coverage, while others may overinsure, unnecessarily straining their financial resources. It is a delicate balance to strike, and understanding the nuances of life insurance is pivotal to making informed decisions. - read more
|