Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults

3

The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.

In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.

The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.

Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.

The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.

AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.

"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.

"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."

"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.

Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts 22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more

ICA Calls for Strata Law Reforms to Address Rising Insurance Costs in Victoria 22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently called for substantial reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, citing a direct correlation between inadequate governance and escalating insurance premiums for residents. With approximately one in five Victorians residing in strata-titled properties, the need for effective management and oversight has become increasingly critical. - read more

Sure Insurance Expands Strata Coverage to $20 Million to Enhance Affordability in Northern Queensland 22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant move to address the longstanding issue of insurance affordability in Northern and Regional Queensland, Sure Insurance has announced an increase in its residential strata insurance coverage from $5 million to $20 million. This strategic enhancement aims to provide body corporates and lot owners with more competitive premium options and improved access to essential insurance services. - read more

Artificial Intelligence: The Foremost Risk for Australian Enterprises 22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant shift within the Australian business landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) has ascended to the top of the risk agenda for local enterprises. According to Allianz's annual global risk survey, 61% of Australian executives now identify AI as their primary concern, marking the first instance where this technology has led the risk list in Australia. This represents a substantial leap from its eighth-place ranking in the previous year. - read more