The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Strata Communities Endorse Call for Enhanced Resilience Reforms 04 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Strata communities are at the forefront of Australia's resilience battle, facing escalating costs, declining coverage, and prolonged recovery periods following disasters. Strata Community Association Australasia (SCA) has expressed strong support for the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA) recent call for coordinated, long-term resilience reforms to protect communities from these challenges. - read more |
| Push for Strata Insurance Reform Escalates After PICA's Withdrawal Threat 04 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The debate over transparency in strata insurance has intensified following reports that PICA Group, Australia's largest strata management company, threatened to withdraw its membership from the Strata Community Association (SCA) New South Wales. This move comes as the SCA pushes to phase out commissions on strata insurance, a practice long criticised for creating conflicts of interest between strata managers and property owners. - read more |
| Australian Insurers Tackle Premium Affordability Challenges in 2026 04 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In 2026, Australian insurers are placing a strong emphasis on premium affordability as they confront escalating claims costs and climate-related losses. This shift in focus is driven by a combination of factors that are reshaping the insurance landscape. - read more |
| ASIC's 2026 Enforcement Agenda: Implications for the Insurance Sector 04 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has unveiled its enforcement priorities for 2026, placing a significant emphasis on the insurance sector. Key areas of focus include failures in insurance claims and complaints handling, as well as misleading pricing practices that may impact Australians' cost of living. - read more |
| How to Compare Life Insurance Policies in Australia Without Overpaying Life insurance stands as a pillar of financial stability in the lives of many Australians, providing peace of mind and security for families and individuals facing the uncertainty of the future. The importance of life insurance cannot be overstated; it offers a safety net that serves to protect your loved ones in the event of a tragedy, ensuring their financial well-being during difficult times. - read more
|
| Creating a Comprehensive Risk Management Plan for Business Partnerships Risk management in the context of business partnerships involves identifying, assessing, and prioritising risks that could impact the success of a business alliance. Whether it’s financial, operational, or reputational, understanding these risks helps partners make informed decisions, safeguarding their shared interests. - read more
|
| Understanding Income Protection Insurance: A Comprehensive Guide for Australians Income protection insurance is an essential component of financial security for Australians, designed to provide a safety net by replacing a portion of your income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. Despite its critical role in safeguarding livelihoods, it's often overlooked in personal financial planning. - read more
|
| Insuring Your Practice: Key Considerations for Australian Health Care Workers Income protection insurance is a safeguard for your financial stability, designed to provide peace of mind when you most need it. As a healthcare professional, you’re dedicated to caring for others, but it’s essential to protect your own income against unexpected events. - read more
|