The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Australian SMEs 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Australia are increasingly burdened by soaring insurance premiums, with many facing hikes of 30% or more within a single year. This surge has led some businesses to either reduce their coverage or forgo insurance altogether, exposing them to significant financial risks. - read more |
| Upcover's New Management Liability Insurance for SMEs 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Australian insurtech company Upcover has unveiled a new management liability insurance product designed specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders. This offering aims to provide comprehensive protection against a range of risks that business owners may encounter. - read more |
| QBE Strengthens Cyber Insurance Offerings 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In response to the growing prevalence of cyber threats and increasingly stringent regulations, QBE Insurance has announced a strategic initiative to bolster its cyber insurance capabilities. This move aims to provide brokers and their clients with more robust support in navigating the complex landscape of cyber risks. - read more |
| Australian Insurers Report $1.11 Billion Profit in Q1 2025 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian insurance industry has reported a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion for the first quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This figure includes contributions of $990 million from insurers and $123 million from reinsurers. The insurance service result, a key measure of underwriting performance, stood at $1.32 billion for the quarter, complemented by investment returns totaling $1.18 billion. - read more |
| 5 Key Factors to Consider When Shopping for Income Protection in Australia Welcome to our comprehensive guide on securing your financial future in Australia. In a world of uncertainties, income protection insurance plays a critical role in maintaining your financial security and peace of mind. - read more
|
| How to Ensure Your Travel Insurance Covers Your Next Adventure Sport Australians are known for their adventurous spirit, often seeking thrills through activities such as bungee jumping, surfing, and skiing. Adventure sports provide an adrenaline rush and an escape from the everyday routine, making them highly appealing to those who crave excitement and challenge. - read more
|
| Income Protection: How to Safeguard Your Earnings in Uncertain Times In the landscape of personal financial planning, income protection insurance emerges as a critical safeguard against the unpredictable nature of life's many uncertainties. As we navigate through economic turbulence and job market volatility, the importance of income protection becomes ever more apparent. This type of insurance serves as a financial backstop, designed to provide a stable flow of income when you're unable to work due to sickness or injury. - read more
|
| How to Choose the Right Income Protection Insurance as a Freelancer Income protection insurance is a type of coverage designed to replace a portion of your income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. It's an incredibly vital form of insurance for freelancers, who may not have the same safety nets as traditional employees, such as paid sick leave or disability benefits. - read more
|