The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies 19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant development for policyholders, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection (IP) policies. This initiative, effective from August 8, 2025, aims to incentivise proactive health management by offering premium discounts to clients who engage in preventative health checks. - read more |
| New Legislation Prohibits Life Insurers from Using Genetic Test Results 19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian government has enacted legislation prohibiting life insurers from using the results of genetic tests to refuse coverage or increase premiums. This landmark decision aims to eliminate genetic discrimination and encourage individuals to undergo potentially life-saving genetic testing without fear of financial repercussions. - read more |
| Markel Insurance Expands into Australian Marine Market with New Leadership 19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Markel Insurance has announced the appointment of Tim Wills as Head of Marine for Australia, marking a significant expansion into the country's marine insurance sector. Based in Sydney, Wills will spearhead the introduction of Markel's marine products, starting with marine cargo insurance. - read more |
| Pelagic Risk Services Strengthens Marina Support with Gold Sponsorship 19 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Pelagic Risk Services, a specialist marine insurance broker, has elevated its commitment to the marina industry by upgrading from Silver to Gold Sponsorship with the Marina Industries Association (MIA). This move underscores Pelagic's dedication to supporting marinas across Australia through enhanced financial contributions and the provision of exclusive risk management resources. - read more |
| Understanding Life Insurance Needs: A Guide for Australian Families Life insurance is a financial product designed to provide peace of mind by offering a safety net for your loved ones in the event of your passing. The primary purpose of life insurance is to ensure that your family is financially protected, allowing them to maintain their standard of living even without your income. - read more
|
| Income Protection Insurance for Personal Trainers: What You Should Know Imagine waking up to find you're unable to work for an extended period due to an unexpected injury. For personal trainers, whose livelihood depends on their physical ability, this scenario can be both financially and emotionally daunting. - read more
|
| Common Misconceptions About Income Protection Insurance Explained Income protection insurance is a crucial financial safeguard for anyone who relies on their salary to pay the bills. It provides a substitute income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury, ensuring that your financial obligations can still be met when you're not able to earn your usual wage. - read more
|
| Life Events That Should Trigger a Life Insurance Review for Aussie Families Life insurance is a cornerstone of financial planning for Aussie families, offering protection and peace of mind. But what happens when the bustling flow of life brings changes? This is where a life insurance review comes into play. A life insurance review is a thorough analysis of your existing policy to ensure it aligns with your current life circumstances and financial goals. - read more
|