Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Isuzu Australia Introduces Comprehensive Truck Leasing and Finance Services 13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori Isuzu Australia has announced a significant advancement in its service offerings with the establishment of Isuzu Financial Services Australia (IFSA), a dedicated truck leasing and finance company. This initiative marks the first time the Isuzu Group has founded such a company outside of Japan, highlighting the strategic importance of the Australian market. - read more |
| Insurer Ordered to Cover Engine Damage Resulting from Driver's Negligence 13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favor of a trucking company, mandating that their insurer cover engine damage resulting from a driver's negligence. This decision underscores the importance of comprehending policy exclusions and the circumstances under which insurers are obligated to pay claims. - read more |
| Freight Company Prevails in Dangerous Goods Disclosure Dispute 13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled in favor of a freight company in a dispute over the disclosure of transporting dangerous goods. This decision provides clarity on the disclosure obligations of companies handling hazardous materials and their impact on insurance coverage. - read more |
| Navigating Rising Premiums in Australia's Insurance Sector 13 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In 2026, Australian insurers are grappling with significant challenges that are influencing premium costs and coverage availability. A recent survey by Gallagher Bassett highlights that premium affordability and insurability have emerged as the foremost concerns for the industry. This shift is largely attributed to escalating climate-related losses and evolving regulatory demands. - read more |
| Income Safety Net: How to Choose the Right Income Protection for Your Lifestyle In the face of life's unpredictable twists and turns, few things are as disconcerting as the possibility of suddenly losing your ability to earn an income due to illness. Such events are often unexpected and can have significant financial repercussions that interrupt not only your flow of daily life but also compromise your future plans. - read more
|
| Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a safeguard that provides individuals with financial stability in the event they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance typically replaces a significant percentage of the insured's income, ensuring that their financial commitments can still be met during periods when they cannot earn an income through employment. - read more
|
| How to Use Insurance to Protect Your Finances and Manage Debt Financial protection and debt management are essential components of maintaining a stable financial life. Without proper safeguards, unexpected events can quickly derail even the best-laid financial plans. - read more
|
| How Illness Can Impact Your Financial Stability: The Role of Income Protection Life is unpredictable, and unforeseen health issues can strike at any time, profoundly impacting your financial well-being. An unexpected illness can bring not only physical pain but also financial strain as medical bills pile up and the capacity to generate income diminishes. - read more
|
The individual or entity who owns the insurance policy.