Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
Quake Damage Claims Dismissed Over Previous Faults
The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Hutch Underwriting's New Landlord Insurance Policy Integrates Cyber Protection 20 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In August 2025, Hutch Underwriting unveiled a new landlord insurance product tailored for Australian residential property owners. This policy stands out by incorporating built-in cyber protection, addressing the growing digital risks landlords face in today's interconnected world. - read more |
| Escalating Insurance Premiums Pose Challenges for Australian Retirees 20 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Australian retirees are facing mounting financial pressures as insurance premiums continue to rise, potentially turning their golden years into a period of economic hardship. The Financial Rights Legal Centre has reported instances where individuals on fixed incomes have experienced premium increases of up to 400%, making it nearly impossible for them to absorb these costs. - read more |
| Australian Life Insurance Market Experiences Notable Recovery 20 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori After enduring six years of decline following the Royal Commission, Australia's life insurance market has reported a significant 20.7% surge in new business volumes during the second quarter of 2025. This increase marks the first substantial recovery in the sector, suggesting a potential turnaround. - read more |
| Australia Enacts Ban on Genetic Discrimination in Life Insurance 20 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In a landmark move, Australia has passed legislation prohibiting life insurers from using individuals' genetic test results in underwriting decisions. This reform aims to eliminate barriers that previously deterred Australians from undergoing potentially life-saving genetic testing due to fears of insurance discrimination. - read more |
| How Much Life Insurance Do You Truly Need? Assessing Your Personal Coverage There's often confusion surrounding the amount of life insurance one truly needs. Common misconceptions cloud our judgment, leading some to undervalue their coverage, while others may overinsure, unnecessarily straining their financial resources. It is a delicate balance to strike, and understanding the nuances of life insurance is pivotal to making informed decisions. - read more
|
| Making Sense of Income Protection Insurance: A Must-Read Comparison for Australians When life throws unexpected challenges our way, the assurance of financial stability can be a beacon of hope amidst the uncertainty. For many Australians, income protection insurance is that beacon, safeguarding their livelihood and providing a crucial safety net when they need it most. It's more than just a policy; it's a strategic step towards longer-term peace of mind. - read more
|
| Loss of income insurance: Case Study Rebecca is a single, self-employed graphic designer who works from home. Aged in her mid-30s, she has monthly commitments of a mortgage and car payments and the usual living expenses. - read more
|
| Protecting Your Professional Income: Understanding Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a financial safety net for individuals who are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you receive a percentage of your income during times when you cannot earn a salary, helping you maintain your lifestyle as you recover. This type of insurance offers peace of mind by providing financial support when it is needed most, allowing you to focus on recovery rather than financial pressures. - read more
|
Insurance which provides protection against liability to third parties.