The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Australian Life Insurance Premiums Set for 1.7% Growth in 2025 18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori According to a recent report by Swiss Re, Australia's life insurance market is projected to experience a 1.7% real growth in premiums in 2025. This anticipated increase is attributed to easing cost-of-living pressures and the repricing of disability income policies. - read more |
| TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection Policies 18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant development for policyholders, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection (IP) policies. This initiative, effective from August 8, 2025, aims to incentivize proactive health management by offering premium discounts to clients who engage in preventive health checks. - read more |
| Pelagic Risk Services Strengthens Commitment to Marinas with Gold Sponsorship 18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant move to bolster support for the marina industry, Pelagic Risk Services has elevated its sponsorship status from Silver to Gold with the Marina Industries Association (MIA). This advancement underscores Pelagic's dedication to enhancing the operational capabilities and risk management strategies of marina operators across Australia. - read more |
| Australian Insurers Falling Behind in Cyber and AI Risk Readiness 18 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In an era where digital threats are escalating, Australian insurers are reportedly less prepared to manage risks associated with cyber threats and artificial intelligence (AI) compared to their global counterparts. This insight emerges from the latest PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey, which assesses the industry's readiness to tackle emerging challenges. - read more |
| Income Protection Insurance vs. Total Permanent Disability: What’s the Difference? When life throws unexpected challenges your way, being financially prepared can make all the difference. This is where Income Protection Insurance and Total Permanent Disability (TPD) Insurance come into play. These two types of insurance provide a crucial safety net, ensuring that you and your family remain financially stable even when you're unable to work due to illness or injury. - read more
|
| Self-Employed? Here's How to Determine Your Income Insurance Coverage Needs In recent times, the allure of being your own boss has led to a significant shift towards self-employment in Australia. This growing trend reflects a desire for greater flexibility and autonomy in one's career. However, amidst this independence lie uncertainties and financial risks unique to those who venture out on their own. - read more
|
| Understanding Life Insurance Needs: A Guide for Australian Families Life insurance is a financial product designed to provide peace of mind by offering a safety net for your loved ones in the event of your passing. The primary purpose of life insurance is to ensure that your family is financially protected, allowing them to maintain their standard of living even without your income. - read more
|
| Estate Planning and Insurance: Safeguarding Your Legacy in Australia Estate planning is a critical process often overlooked, yet it serves as the cornerstone of ensuring that your legacy is protected and seamlessly passed on to your loved ones. It's about securing your financial future and guaranteeing that the assets you've toiled to amass are distributed according to your wishes. In the intricate world of asset protection and family security, being well-informed can make all the difference. - read more
|