The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Understanding the Rise in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate Challenges 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In recent years, Australia's strata insurance market has experienced notable shifts, primarily driven by escalating climate risks and increasing claims costs. As we move through 2026, these factors continue to influence premium rates and underwriting practices, presenting challenges for owners corporations and strata managers. - read more |
| Deloitte's Vision: Navigating Australia's Insurance Landscape in 2026 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian insurance sector approaches 2026, Deloitte has released a comprehensive report detailing eight pivotal predictions that are set to reshape the industry. These insights provide a roadmap for insurers to adapt and thrive amidst evolving challenges and opportunities. - read more |
| APRA Highlights Increase in Intermediated General Insurance Premiums 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest statistics, indicating a notable increase in general insurance premiums placed through intermediaries. This trend reflects the dynamic nature of Australia's insurance landscape and offers insights into the sector's current trajectory. - read more |
| Deloitte's Forecast: Key Insurance Trends for Australia in 2026 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian insurance landscape continues to evolve, Deloitte has released its 2026 Insurance Predictions, highlighting pivotal trends that are set to reshape the industry. These insights are particularly relevant for self-employed professionals seeking to understand how these changes may impact their coverage options and risk management strategies. - read more |
| Income Protection vs. Total Permanent Disability: Which Is Right for You? Financial security is crucial in today's unpredictable world, where unexpected events can disrupt the stability and comfort of our daily lives. For Australians, protecting one's income and lifestyle from unforeseen circumstances is a key component of personal finance. - read more
|
| How to Protect Your Income During Health Setbacks: A Complete Guide Income protection is a crucial safety net for Australians, offering financial security when health setbacks strike. This type of insurance ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income if illness or injury prevents you from working. It’s an essential aspect of financial planning, providing peace of mind knowing that you can maintain your lifestyle even when unforeseen health issues arise. - read more
|
| Affordable Life Insurance: Finding the Right Fit for Your Family's Finances Life insurance is a crucial component in safeguarding your family's financial security. It offers peace of mind, knowing that your loved ones will be protected in the event of unexpected circumstances. Many Australians understand the value of having life insurance, but the task of finding a policy that fits within a family's budget can sometimes feel overwhelming. - read more
|
| How to Prepare Financially for Unexpected Sickness Life is full of surprises, and unfortunately, not all of them are pleasant. Unexpected sickness can strike anyone at any time, and when it does, it can have a significant impact on your income. Whether it’s a sudden illness, a chronic condition, or an accident, the loss of income can add stress to an already difficult situation. - read more
|