The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Understanding AustralianSuper's Income Protection Reduction 16 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori AustralianSuper, one of Australia's largest superannuation funds, has announced a significant change to its default income protection insurance. Effective from 28 February 2026, the fund will reduce the default income protection cover to $1,000 per month. This adjustment aims to align insurance coverage with members' actual income levels and prevent over-insurance, which can erode retirement savings. - read more |
| CareSuper Enhances Income Protection Benefits for Members 16 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori CareSuper has announced an enhancement to its income protection insurance offerings. Starting 1 April 2026, members can apply for income protection cover up to 87% of their current income, including up to 12% super contributions. This is an increase from the previous limit of 85% of income, which included up to 10% super contributions. - read more |
| APRA Enhances Capital Requirements for Sovereign Insurance Australia 16 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently mandated an additional capital requirement of $2 million for Sovereign Insurance Australia Pty Ltd. This directive is part of APRA's ongoing efforts to bolster the financial stability and resilience of insurers operating within Australia. - read more |
| Europ Assistance Australia Enters Market with APRA's Approval 16 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has granted a new general insurance licence to Europ Assistance Australia, marking the company's official entry into the Australian insurance market. This development introduces additional competition and diversity within the sector. - read more |
| Making Sense of Income Protection Insurance: A Must-Read Comparison for Australians When life throws unexpected challenges our way, the assurance of financial stability can be a beacon of hope amidst the uncertainty. For many Australians, income protection insurance is that beacon, safeguarding their livelihood and providing a crucial safety net when they need it most. It's more than just a policy; it's a strategic step towards longer-term peace of mind. - read more
|
| Comparing Income Protection Policies: What Australians Should Look For Income protection insurance serves as a financial safety net for countless Australians, offering a replacement income when unforeseen circumstances such as illness or injury impede their ability to earn. For the self-employed and entrepreneurs who may not have the safety nets offered by corporate employment, such protection is particularly important. - read more
|
| Insuring Your Practice: Key Considerations for Australian Health Care Workers Income protection insurance is a safeguard for your financial stability, designed to provide peace of mind when you most need it. As a healthcare professional, you’re dedicated to caring for others, but it’s essential to protect your own income against unexpected events. - read more
|
| Understanding the Differences: Income Protection vs Total and Permanent Disability Insurance Income protection insurance is a type of policy that provides financial support to individuals who are unable to work due to an illness or injury. The insurance company will pay a portion of the policyholder's earnings, which can be used to cover everyday living expenses and bills. This type of insurance is different from total and permanent disability insurance (TPD) in a few key ways. - read more
|