The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Federal Court Denies Truck Driver's Insurance Appeal 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In a recent legal development, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed an appeal by Bradley Henschke, a logging truck driver, concerning his insurance claim against the Australian Retirement Trust. The court's decision, delivered on February 12, 2026, underscores the critical importance of active insurance coverage for workers in high-risk occupations. - read more |
| Heightened Road Risks Amid Holiday Freight Traffic Surge 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian summer holidays approach, insurers and transport specialists are raising alarms about increased road risks due to the convergence of peak freight activity and heightened passenger vehicle travel. This period traditionally sees a surge in both freight movements and family road trips, leading to congested roads and a higher potential for accidents. - read more |
| InfoAgent Launches Advanced Vehicle Data Services for Heavy Trucks 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Australian vehicle data provider InfoAgent has unveiled two innovative services designed to deliver accurate and detailed information for heavy commercial trucks and trailers. These services aim to address critical challenges in industries such as insurance, roadside assistance, fleet management, and logistics by simplifying processes and enabling better decision-making. - read more |
| Rising Insurance Premiums: A Growing Concern for Australians 25 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In recent times, Australian consumers have been grappling with substantial increases in insurance premiums, prompting widespread concern and scrutiny. Reports indicate that some policyholders have experienced premium hikes ranging from 30% to 50%, with certain cases witnessing even more significant surges. This trend has raised questions about the affordability and transparency of insurance pricing in the country. - read more |
| Top Mistakes to Avoid When Comparing Income Protection Insurance Insurance plays a pivotal role in maintaining financial stability, especially for working adults in Australia. It acts as a safety net, offering peace of mind in the face of uncertainties. By securing an insurance policy, individuals protect themselves against potential financial disruptions caused by unexpected events. - read more
|
| Smart Strategies to Lower Your Health Insurance Premiums In today's rapidly changing health insurance landscape in Australia, keeping track of costs and coverage can be daunting. Many Australians find themselves grappling with high premiums that seem to increase year after year. - read more
|
| Income Protection vs. Life Insurance: Why You Need Both Insurance plays a crucial role in safeguarding our financial future. It serves as a safety net, ensuring that we can manage unexpected events without severely impacting our financial stability. For Australian adults, having the right types of insurance coverage is essential for peace of mind and financial security. - read more
|
| How to Prepare Financially for Unexpected Sickness Life is full of surprises, and unfortunately, not all of them are pleasant. Unexpected sickness can strike anyone at any time, and when it does, it can have a significant impact on your income. Whether it’s a sudden illness, a chronic condition, or an accident, the loss of income can add stress to an already difficult situation. - read more
|