The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Queensland Integrates Heavy Vehicle Compliance with National Regulator 12 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant move towards regulatory uniformity, Queensland has transitioned its heavy vehicle compliance responsibilities to the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR). This change, effective from February 19, 2024, positions Queensland alongside New South Wales, South Australia, Victoria, Tasmania, and the Australian Capital Territory in adopting a cohesive approach to heavy vehicle oversight. - read more |
| Elevated Road Risks Amid Holiday Freight and Travel Surge 12 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian summer school holidays approach, a convergence of increased holiday travel and peak freight activity is raising concerns among insurers and transport specialists about heightened road risks. This period sees a significant uptick in both passenger vehicles and heavy trucks on the roads, amplifying the potential for accidents and necessitating heightened vigilance among all road users. - read more |
| Growing Collision Risks Challenge Australian Fleet Operators 12 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Australia's transport and haulage sector is currently navigating a period of heightened operational risk, marked by an uptick in both the frequency and severity of motor collision claims. This trend underscores the pressing need for fleet operators to adopt proactive risk management strategies and leverage advanced insurance solutions to safeguard their operations. - read more |
| Calls for Super Funds to Accelerate Mental Health Insurance Claims Processing 11 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Consumer advocates are raising concerns over significant delays in processing mental health-related insurance claims by Australian superannuation funds. As mental health conditions become a leading cause of total and permanent disability (TPD) claims, the efficiency of claim processing has come under scrutiny. - read more |
| How to Choose the Right Income Protection Policy as a Beautician Welcome, beauty professionals, to a discussion that could significantly impact your financial future—income protection insurance. As a beautician, your hands-on work is your livelihood, making it imperative to safeguard that income against unforeseen circumstances. - read more
|
| Deciphering Your Policy: A Beginner's Guide to Insurance Terminology Welcome to the world of insurance – a domain where words like 'deductible' and 'premium' can significantly impact your financial protection and peace of mind. As a beginner, grasping the basics of insurance terminology is the first step towards making informed decisions about the policies that safeguard your assets and future. In this guide, we will embark on a journey through the language of insurance, which can often seem as complex as the policies themselves. - read more
|
| Income Protection vs. Total Permanent Disability: Which Is Right for You? Financial security is crucial in today's unpredictable world, where unexpected events can disrupt the stability and comfort of our daily lives. For Australians, protecting one's income and lifestyle from unforeseen circumstances is a key component of personal finance. - read more
|
| How Illness Can Impact Your Financial Stability: The Role of Income Protection Life is unpredictable, and unforeseen health issues can strike at any time, profoundly impacting your financial well-being. An unexpected illness can bring not only physical pain but also financial strain as medical bills pile up and the capacity to generate income diminishes. - read more
|