The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Understanding the Rise in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate Challenges 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In recent years, Australia's strata insurance market has experienced notable shifts, primarily driven by escalating climate risks and increasing claims costs. As we move through 2026, these factors continue to influence premium rates and underwriting practices, presenting challenges for owners corporations and strata managers. - read more |
| Deloitte's Vision: Navigating Australia's Insurance Landscape in 2026 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian insurance sector approaches 2026, Deloitte has released a comprehensive report detailing eight pivotal predictions that are set to reshape the industry. These insights provide a roadmap for insurers to adapt and thrive amidst evolving challenges and opportunities. - read more |
| APRA Highlights Increase in Intermediated General Insurance Premiums 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released its latest statistics, indicating a notable increase in general insurance premiums placed through intermediaries. This trend reflects the dynamic nature of Australia's insurance landscape and offers insights into the sector's current trajectory. - read more |
| Deloitte's Forecast: Key Insurance Trends for Australia in 2026 12 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori As the Australian insurance landscape continues to evolve, Deloitte has released its 2026 Insurance Predictions, highlighting pivotal trends that are set to reshape the industry. These insights are particularly relevant for self-employed professionals seeking to understand how these changes may impact their coverage options and risk management strategies. - read more |
| Covering the Unexpected: A Guide to Trauma Insurance for Australian Families Trauma insurance, also known as critical illness insurance, is a type of coverage that provides a lump sum payment in the event that the insured suffers from a critical illness or injury. Unlike health insurance, which covers medical expenses, trauma insurance is designed to provide financial protection by helping to cover the additional costs associated with recovery from a severe illness or injury. - read more
|
| Why Every Australian Needs Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is designed to provide financial support if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income, allowing you to cover your living expenses and maintain your standard of living during difficult times. - read more
|
| Understanding Life Insurance: How to Determine Coverage Amounts Life insurance is a cornerstone of financial planning, offering peace of mind to you and security for your loved ones. It's a contract between you and an insurance company: in exchange for regular premiums, the insurer agrees to pay a sum of money to designated beneficiaries upon your passing. This vital tool ensures that your family's financial needs can be met during an incredibly difficult time. - read more
|
| Why Income Protection Insurance is Essential for Self-Employed Australians Income protection insurance is a type of coverage designed to provide you with a steady income if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. Unlike other types of insurance, which may focus on lump-sum payments, income protection insurance prioritises regular income replacement to help cover your everyday expenses. - read more
|