The company behind the claim stated that the properties were impacted by a 5.4-magnitude earthquake that occurred in November 2018. Although the earthquake's epicenter was approximately 45 kilometers away from the buildings, Geoscience Australia specified the evident damage radius to be no more than 27 kilometers from the epicenter.
In their defense, the claimant's engineering expert conceded that the buildings were situated outside the primary damage zone but contended that the earthquake’s vibrations had unleashed energy beneath the geological formations on which the houses stood.
The expert identified "preexisting or dormant conditions" in the properties, including previously repaired damage which, according to him, reopened due to ground movement prompted by the quake, also leading to the manifestation of new fractures.
Meanwhile, Allianz, the insurance provider, enlisted a forensic civil and structural engineer who assessed the damages. His findings revealed brickwork fissures in multiple sections of one property, referred to as House H, and evident cracks within the garage of the second property, termed House P, in addition to a separation between a storeroom and the home.
The engineer hired by Allianz attributed the damage to prolonged foundation instability and deterioration of the mortar used in the brickwork, rather than to the seismic event.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) upheld the insurer’s position, noting that both engineers corroborated the presence of damage similar to what was being contested even before the 2018 earthquake, specifically in House H.
AFCA further mentioned that updates made to certain rooms within the house remained unaffected, while external brickwork conditions pointed towards significant wear and tear, contributing to the losses. Comparable remarks were also made in regard to House P.
"While both experts agree it is conceivable for House H to incur earthquake-related damage under ideal conditions despite its location outside the designated impact radius, the insurer's expert refuted the existence of such conditions in this case," stated the adjudicator from AFCA.
"Even if the earthquake were recognized as being a proximate cause of the damage to House H, it would coexist with other excluded factors (wear and tear, prolonged structural movement)."
"Consequently, the insurer maintains the right to invoke those exclusions as a basis for denying the claim," AFCA concluded.
Published:Thursday, 1st Aug 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Australian Insurers Adapt Investment Strategies in Response to Geopolitical Shifts 07 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori Australian insurers are actively revising their investment portfolios in response to evolving geopolitical events and economic conditions. According to the 2025 Australian Insurance Report by Janus Henderson Investors, 47% of insurers plan to increase their investment portfolio risk over the next 12 months, with a significant focus on private markets. - read more |
| Rising Insurance Premiums: What Australian Beauticians Need to Know 07 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori Recent industry reports indicate that Australian insurers are facing significant challenges due to escalating claims costs and broader economic pressures. This trend is leading to adjustments in premium rates, which could have direct implications for beauty salon owners and professionals. - read more |
| How AI is Transforming Investment Strategies in Australia's Insurance Sector 07 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian insurance industry is increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to refine investment strategies and enhance portfolio performance. A recent report by Janus Henderson Investors reveals that nearly half of Australian insurers plan to increase their investment portfolio risk over the next year, with AI playing a pivotal role in this shift. - read more |
| What Beauticians Can Expect from the Upcoming Insurance News Outlook 2026 Conference 07 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori The Insurance News Outlook 2026 conference, scheduled for March 19 in Sydney, is set to delve into the evolving landscape of claims trends and the accelerating influence of technology within the insurance industry. This event presents a valuable opportunity for beauty salon owners and professionals to gain insights into developments that could impact their insurance coverage and claims processes. - read more |
| Income protection insurance It's trite but true to say that, for most people, their most valuable asset is their ability to earn an income. But how relevant is income insurance to most Australians? - read more
|
| Strategies to Use Life Insurance in Funding Shareholder Agreements Shareholder agreements lay the cornerstone for stable business relationships and continuity in Australia. Acting as a contract among business owners, these agreements set forth the expectations, rights, and obligations of all parties involved. They are particularly vital in delineating clear paths for dispute resolution, succession planning, and the transfer of ownership shares under varied circumstances, including the untimely death or departure of a shareholder. - read more
|
| How Much Life Insurance Do I Need? There are many different reasons to purchase life insurance (generation skipping tax, estate plan, estate preservation, surviving spouse needs, planning for your children's future and more). There is no right amount of life insurance, but here are some guidelines that might help you decide how much life insurance you need. - read more
|
| Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a safeguard that provides individuals with financial stability in the event they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance typically replaces a significant percentage of the insured's income, ensuring that their financial commitments can still be met during periods when they cannot earn an income through employment. - read more
|