AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Mackay Sugar Cyber Incident Highlights a New Risk for Farm Businesses

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A reported ransomware incident affecting Mackay Sugar has put agricultural cyber risk back in the spotlight, this time with a clear lesson for producers who depend on processors, contractors and shared infrastructure. ABC Rural reported on 18 June 2026 that a Russian-speaking ransomware operation known as The Gentlemen had claimed responsibility for a cyber attack that disrupted two Mackay Sugar mills, with the company working to verify the claim and restart Farleigh and Racecourse mills in stages. - read more

What the 2026 Hearing Services Update Means for Allied Health Cover

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government has released the Hearing Services Program Provider Notice 2026-4, confirming that the updated Schedule of Service Items and Fees 2026-27 is now available. While the notice is highly specific to hearing service providers, it carries a broader message for allied health businesses: regulatory changes rarely sit neatly in one folder. They can affect billing, consent, scope of practice, client communications and, ultimately, the way professional risks are insured. - read more

What Broker Breach Reporting Means for Fitness Professionals

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

New broker compliance data has put a spotlight on an issue that matters to every fitness professional who relies on public liability, professional indemnity or broader business insurance: renewal timing and communication. On 18 June 2026, Insurance Business reported that the Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee`s 2025 Annual Data Report recorded 5,417 breaches of the Insurance Brokers Code of Practice affecting 14,842 clients. - read more

Late Insurance Renewals Put Consultant Cover in the Spotlight

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian consultants rely on timely, accurate insurance renewals to keep professional indemnity, public liability and other business covers aligned with current contracts. A recent annual compliance update from the insurance broking sector has underlined why renewal discipline matters: missed or late renewal contact was reported as the leading category of broker code breaches for the past year. - read more

Click for more Insurance News