AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Envest Group Unveils TLI Underwriting for Heavy Motor Fleets 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Envest Group, a prominent player in Australia's insurance sector, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialised insurance solutions for heavy motor fleet operators. This strategic move aims to address the unique challenges faced by larger transport businesses in Australia. - read more

AFCA Directs AIA to Pay Truck Driver's TPD Benefit After Decade-Long Dispute 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), insurance provider AIA has been directed to pay a total and permanent disability (TPD) benefit to a truck driver, concluding a protracted dispute that spanned over a decade. - read more

ICA Proposes Reforms to Reduce Insurance Costs in Queensland 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently submitted a series of recommendations to the Queensland Productivity Commission, aiming to address escalating insurance costs and bolster housing resilience across the state. These proposals are particularly pertinent to tradespeople, who are integral to the construction and maintenance of Queensland's housing infrastructure. - read more

NSW Builders Advised to Obtain Professional Indemnity Insurance Before 2026 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In light of recent legislative changes, BizCover is urging registered building practitioners in New South Wales (NSW) to secure professional indemnity (PI) insurance well ahead of the July 1, 2026 compliance deadline. This advisory follows the extension of the enforcement date under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2021, which now mandates that builders hold PI insurance deemed sufficient to cover potential liabilities. - read more