The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Beauty Therapist Successfully Challenges Insurer Over Flood Damage Claim 23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant ruling, a beauty therapist has achieved partial coverage for damages after contesting her insurer's application of a flood exclusion clause. This case underscores the complexities beauticians face when navigating insurance claims related to water damage. - read more |
| ASIC Intensifies Oversight on Insurance Pricing and Claims Handling 23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has unveiled new enforcement priorities for the upcoming year, placing a spotlight on insurance pricing, claims handling, and complaints processes. This move aims to enhance consumer protection and ensure fair practices within the insurance industry. - read more |
| Melbourne Hairdresser Successfully Claims Business Interruption Due to Pandemic 23 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori A Melbourne-based hairdressing salon has won a business interruption (BI) insurance dispute after demonstrating that a local COVID-19 outbreak led to a significant decline in revenue, even before government-imposed lockdowns. - read more |
| Revolutionising Crop Insurance: DAS Unveils Cutting-Edge Data Tool 22 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Digital Agriculture Services (DAS) has introduced an innovative crop insurance solution in Australia, leveraging machine learning, automapping, and geospatial data to improve policy accuracy. This tool is designed to assist insurers, underwriters, brokers, and loss adjusters by precisely locating insured paddocks and identifying crop types, yields, and other critical details. - read more |
| Protecting Your Future: A Simple Approach to Life and Disability Insurance Welcome to the crucial conversation about safeguarding your future through life and disability insurance. Many of us ponder the distant horizon of life's 'what ifs,' but are we truly prepared? The reality is that our financial security can be drastically affected by unforeseen events—a serious illness or a sudden disability that prevents us from working. That's where life and disability insurance come into play, serving as critical safety nets that can keep us afloat during tough times. - read more
|
| How Much Life Insurance Do You Truly Need? Assessing Your Personal Coverage There's often confusion surrounding the amount of life insurance one truly needs. Common misconceptions cloud our judgment, leading some to undervalue their coverage, while others may overinsure, unnecessarily straining their financial resources. It is a delicate balance to strike, and understanding the nuances of life insurance is pivotal to making informed decisions. - read more
|
| Understanding the Differences: Income Protection vs Total and Permanent Disability Insurance Income protection insurance is a type of policy that provides financial support to individuals who are unable to work due to an illness or injury. The insurance company will pay a portion of the policyholder's earnings, which can be used to cover everyday living expenses and bills. This type of insurance is different from total and permanent disability insurance (TPD) in a few key ways. - read more
|
| Health Insurance for Young Australians: Why Starting Early Pays Off Health insurance is a crucial aspect of managing both health and financial risks. Many Australians may not realize the significance of having robust health coverage until they face unexpected medical expenses. Starting early with health insurance can not only provide peace of mind but also pave the way for better health management in the long run. - read more
|