AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Allianz Partners Introduces Tailored Cruise Travel Insurance for Australians 22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In a strategic move to cater to the growing number of Australian cruise enthusiasts, Allianz Partners has unveiled a cruise-specific travel insurance product in collaboration with Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL). This initiative aims to provide comprehensive coverage tailored to the unique needs of cruise travellers. - read more |
| Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Cybersecurity Readiness 22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are trailing behind their global counterparts in cybersecurity preparedness. This lag is particularly concerning given the rapid evolution of cyber threats, especially those enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI). - read more |
| Australian General Insurers Report Record Profits Amid Premium Hikes 22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Australia's general insurance industry has reported a remarkable financial performance, achieving a 19% return on equity (ROE) for the 2025 financial year—the highest in a decade. This significant milestone reflects a combination of strategic premium increases and favourable market conditions. - read more |
| Australian Life Insurance Sector Anticipates Steady Growth Amid Economic Recovery 22 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian life insurance market is on a trajectory of steady growth, with projections indicating an increase in gross written premiums (GWP) from $26.2 billion in 2025 to $30.5 billion by 2029. This represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.9%, reflecting a positive outlook for the sector. - read more |
| How to Compare Income Protection Policies When You Have a Medical History In today's ever-changing world, financial security is a cornerstone of peace of mind, particularly for Australians grappling with medical histories. Income protection insurance emerges as a pivotal solution, safeguarding not only the individual’s fiscal health but the well-being of their dependents. This introduction explores the nuances of income protection insurance and its particular significance for those with pre-existing medical conditions. - read more
|
| How to Choose the Right Income Protection Insurance as a Freelancer Income protection insurance is a type of coverage designed to replace a portion of your income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. It's an incredibly vital form of insurance for freelancers, who may not have the same safety nets as traditional employees, such as paid sick leave or disability benefits. - read more
|
| Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a safeguard that provides individuals with financial stability in the event they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance typically replaces a significant percentage of the insured's income, ensuring that their financial commitments can still be met during periods when they cannot earn an income through employment. - read more
|
| Why Every Australian Needs Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is designed to provide financial support if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you continue to receive a portion of your income, allowing you to cover your living expenses and maintain your standard of living during difficult times. - read more
|
A type of life insurance that provides coverage for the insured's entire lifetime, with a savings component that builds cash value.