AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Nutrien Ag Solutions Tops Roy Morgan's Trusted Agribusiness Survey 27 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant development within the Australian agricultural sector, Nutrien Ag Solutions has been recognised as the nation's most trusted agribusiness, according to the latest Roy Morgan survey. This marks the first time Nutrien has achieved this distinction, overtaking Elders, a longstanding leader in the industry. - read more

Australian Sheep Industry's $139.8 Million Transition Plan in Full Swing 27 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian sheep industry is making significant strides in its $139.8 million transition plan, aimed at modernising and strengthening the sector. Recent weeks have seen the release of several grant programs under the Sheep Industry Transition Assistance Package (SITAP), providing much-needed support to farmers and associated businesses. - read more

PGA of Western Australia Back on Track After Financial Turmoil 27 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Pastoralists and Graziers Association of Western Australia (PGA) has successfully navigated a period of financial uncertainty, emerging stronger after addressing internal financial irregularities. The organisation's commitment to transparency and effective management has been pivotal in restoring confidence among its members and the broader agricultural community. - read more

Rising Insurance Premiums Pose Financial Challenges for Australian Farmers 27 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Australian farmers are currently facing significant financial challenges due to a sharp increase in insurance premiums. Reports indicate that some farmers have experienced a 20% rise in premiums over the past year, a trend largely attributed to the escalating risks associated with climate change. This surge in costs is prompting a concerning number of farmers to reconsider their insurance coverage, with some opting to forgo it entirely, thereby exposing themselves to substantial financial risk. - read more