AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
A recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has affected a woman’s critical illness claims, as her diagnosis came within mere days of her policy's eligibility period drawing to an end.
The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Asteron Life’s ownership transition from Suncorp to Resolution Life has put another spotlight on a practical question for New Zealand life insurance customers: what should you do when the company behind your policy changes? For most existing policyholders, an ownership change does not automatically rewrite the promises in a current contract. - read more
Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more
A recent Good Returns TV discussion with Financial Markets Authority Director of Deposit Taking, Insurance and Advice Michael Hewes has renewed attention on a practical issue for New Zealand households: too many people still find financial advice hard to access, hard to understand, or too time-consuming to begin. - read more
Partners Life has introduced a new Life Advantage discount, giving eligible customers a permanent reduction on selected life and trauma-related covers. The offer is aimed at non-smokers aged 16 and over who meet a specified body mass index range and complete full medical underwriting when applying for new or increased cover. - read more
Life insurance advisers and brokers can help New Zealand consumers compare policies, understand underwriting questions and arrange cover. This guide explains how advice is regulated, what disclosures to expect, how commissions may work and what to do if you have a complaint. - read more
Life insurance is designed to provide a payment if the insured person dies or, in some policies, is diagnosed with a terminal illness and the claim meets the policy terms. For families and beneficiaries, the claims process can occur at a difficult time, so it is important to understand how claims are assessed and what issues may affect whether a claim is paid. - read more
Life insurance is a crucial financial safety net, offering monetary support to beneficiaries or an estate upon the death or terminal diagnosis of the insured. In New Zealand, life insurance options differ greatly, with variations in pricing, included features, claim evaluations, and specific conditions. - read more
Life insurance underwriting is the assessment an insurer carries out after you apply for cover. It helps determine whether cover can be offered, what premium may apply, and whether any special terms, exclusions or loadings are needed. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your
privacy.
Knowledgebase
Double Indemnity: A clause or provision in a life insurance policy that doubles the payout in cases of accidental death.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.