AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

2

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Landmark Genetic Test Protection Gains Massive Support 17 Sep 2024: Paige Estritori The federal government’s recent move to prohibit the usage of genetic test outcomes in life insurance underwriting has garnered substantial endorsement from various sectors. - read more

Rising Home Insurance Costs Heat Up Household Finances 17 Sep 2024: Paige Estritori Recent data published by the Actuaries Institute indicates a surge in financial strain among Australian households brought about by climbing home insurance premiums. Remarkably, a staggering 1.6 million households are now feeling the pressure, marking a 30% increase over the last year, equivalent to an additional 360,000 households. - read more

Swiss Re Outpaces Expectations with Strategic Renewals and Diminished Catastrophe Claims 17 Sep 2024: Paige Estritori Swiss Re has reported a significant surge in net income, reaching $US2.1 billion ($3.09 billion) for the first half of 2024. This impressive performance has been largely attributed to favorable factors including reduced natural catastrophe claims, robust investment earnings, and strategic underwriting approaches. - read more

Autonomous Cars: Navigating the New Claims Terrain 10 Sep 2024: Paige Estritori The rapid evolution of automobile technology, particularly in autonomous vehicles, is poised to reshape the insurance landscape significantly, according to insights from Howden Re. Reinsurers need to anticipate a more complex claims environment that requires advanced strategies to effectively manage the potential complexities. - read more