AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| RACQ Insurance Withdraws Rideshare Vehicle Coverage 23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori RACQ Insurance has recently announced the cessation of coverage for rideshare and food delivery vehicles, effective from November 3, 2023. This decision stems from a notable increase in claims associated with these services, prompting the insurer to reassess its offerings. - read more |
| AFCA Directs Insurer to Settle Restaurant Arson Claim 23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a restaurant owner, directing the insurer to honour an arson claim despite the director's failure to disclose a past criminal conviction. This decision underscores the importance of clear communication and due diligence in the insurance application process. - read more |
| Upcover Introduces Affordable Management Liability Insurance for SMEs 23 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Upcover, a Sydney-based insurtech company, has recently launched a management liability insurance product tailored specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders. With premiums starting at $780 per year for a $1 million coverage limit, this offering aims to provide affordable and comprehensive protection against various business risks. - read more |
| CHU's 2025 Report Shows Stability in Strata Insurance Premiums Amid Climate and Regulatory Shifts 22 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more |
| What Australians Need to Know Before Choosing an Income Protection Plan Income protection insurance is a critical safety net for Australians, offering financial security in the event that one is unable to work due to illness or injury. The peace of mind it brings cannot be overstated, as it ensures that individuals and their families can maintain their standard of living even when the unexpected happens. - read more
|
| Why Income Protection Insurance Matters for Every Australian Earner The unpredictable nature of life can often leave us vulnerable to financial uncertainty, especially when it comes to our ability to earn an income. Whether due to illness, injury, or unexpected job loss, the loss of income can have a devastating impact on our financial stability and quality of life. This is where the importance of insurance in financial planning becomes evident. - read more
|
| Life Events That Should Trigger a Life Insurance Review for Aussie Families Life insurance is a cornerstone of financial planning for Aussie families, offering protection and peace of mind. But what happens when the bustling flow of life brings changes? This is where a life insurance review comes into play. A life insurance review is a thorough analysis of your existing policy to ensure it aligns with your current life circumstances and financial goals. - read more
|
| Life Insurance and Estate Planning: What You Need to Know Life insurance and estate planning are critical components of financial security. They ensure that your loved ones are protected financially when you are no longer around. By understanding these tools, you can take significant steps to secure your family's future. - read more
|
An insurance that provides cover for liability incurred in the course of exercising a profession.