AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Insuregroup's Remarkable Growth Reflects Surge in Truck Insurance Demand 07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Insuregroup, a specialist insurance brokerage serving Australia's transport and logistics sector, has recently announced a significant milestone: processing over 10,000 insurance policies since its inception, with a 25% increase in policy volume over the past year. This growth underscores the escalating demand for comprehensive truck insurance solutions tailored to the unique needs of Australian freight operators. - read more |
| Envest Group Unveils TLI Underwriting: A New Era for Heavy Motor Fleet Insurance 07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Envest Group, a prominent player in Australia's insurance sector, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialized insurance solutions for heavy motor fleet operators. This strategic move aims to address the unique challenges faced by larger transport businesses in Australia. - read more |
| ASIC Initiates Legal Proceedings Against QBE for Alleged Misleading Discount Practices 07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced legal action against QBE Insurance, alleging that the insurer misled more than 500,000 customers regarding premium discounts over a five-year period. This development has significant implications for the Australian insurance industry, particularly for policyholders seeking transparency and fairness in premium calculations. - read more |
| Declining Construction Insurance Premiums: A Boon for Australian Tradies 07 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In 2025, Australia's construction insurance market has experienced a significant shift, with premiums decreasing across various lines due to intensified competition among insurers. This trend is particularly beneficial for tradespeople, commonly known as 'tradies,' who are witnessing more affordable coverage options. - read more |
| Common Mistakes to Avoid When Comparing Life Insurance Policies Choosing the right life insurance policy is one of the most important decisions for Australians, especially for those who are middle-aged or older. Life insurance provides financial security for your loved ones in the event of your passing, ensuring that they are not burdened with financial hardships. - read more
|
| 5 Common Misconceptions About Income Protection Insurance in Australia Income protection insurance is a vital safety net for many Australians, offering financial stability when unexpected circumstances like illness or injury occur. Despite its importance, there are numerous misconceptions surrounding this type of insurance, leading to confusion and inadequate coverage among consumers. - read more
|
| How Tradespeople Can Maximize Tax Deductions Through Insurance Tradespeople work hard to earn their income, often facing unique expenses that can impact their bottom line. Understanding and maximizing tax deductions is crucial for minimizing these costs and keeping more of what they earn. By making informed decisions about expenses, tradespeople can significantly reduce their taxable income. - read more
|
| Income protection insurance It's trite but true to say that, for most people, their most valuable asset is their ability to earn an income. But how relevant is income insurance to most Australians? - read more
|
An agent acting on behalf of the insured (not the insurance company) who negotiates the terms and cover provided by the insurer in the insurance policy.