AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case
The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.
However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.
In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.
The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.
While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.
"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.
"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."
The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.
"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.
For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.
Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| NSW and SA Initiate Trials for Increased Mass Limits on Zero-Emissions Trucks 13 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant move towards sustainable transport, New South Wales (NSW) and South Australia (SA) have commenced trials permitting higher mass limits for zero-emissions trucks. This initiative aims to encourage the adoption of environmentally friendly heavy vehicles by addressing existing regulatory constraints. - read more |
| Austroads Survey Uncovers Safety Concerns with Overseas Licensed Heavy Vehicle Drivers 13 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori A recent survey conducted by Austroads has brought to light significant safety concerns regarding overseas licensed heavy vehicle drivers operating in Australia. With over 1,900 respondents, the survey aims to inform potential policy changes to enhance road safety and driver competency. - read more |
| ICA Advocates for Government Reforms to Mitigate Rising Motor Insurance Premiums 13 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has issued a call for urgent government action to address the escalating costs of motor insurance premiums. Highlighting a 42% increase in comprehensive motor insurance premiums since 2019, the ICA attributes this surge to various systemic cost drivers. - read more |
| Suncorp's Earnings Surge and Share Buyback Announcement 13 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori Suncorp, a prominent Australian insurer, has reported an 8% increase in full-year cash earnings, reaching A$1.49 billion for the year ending June 30, 2025. This performance exceeded analyst expectations and underscores the company's robust financial health. - read more |
| What Hospitality Business Owners Need to Know About Income Protection Insurance The Australian hospitality industry is renowned for its vibrancy, yet it also faces significant challenges. With fluctuating demand, seasonal changes, and unpredictable external factors such as economic downturns and pandemics, hospitality businesses often operate in a high-risk environment. For hotel operators, the stakes are even higher due to substantial investments in property, staff, and customer service. - read more
|
| Why Every Tradie Needs Tailored Insurance: Protecting Your Livelihood In Australia, tradies are the backbone of many local communities, providing essential services in fields such as construction, plumbing, electrical work, and more. These skilled professionals often operate their own businesses or work as contractors, making financial stability paramount. - read more
|
| Why life insurance is a necessity in tough times With household budgets under pressure ... and consumer confidence weak, many families are wondering whether life insurance is worth the expense. Or maybe it is something they can do without? - read more
|
| Too Young to Insure? and Other Life Insurance Misconceptions in Australia Many Australians recognise the importance of life insurance, yet a substantial number believe that it's a concern for the later stages of life. This common oversight can lead to missed opportunities for financial security and peace of mind. In this introductory section, we'll address why life insurance is a pivotal component of financial planning for individuals at any age, including the young adults just starting their careers. - read more
|
A type of insurance that provides protection against claims resulting from injuries and damage to people and/or property.