AFCA Upholds Insurer’s Decision in Breast Cancer Claim Case

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The woman was diagnosed with cancer in her right breast on October 5 of last year, followed by the discovery of cancer in her left breast eight days later. She filed claims under her critical illness policy that she had obtained on July 17.

However, TAL Life, her insurance provider, rejected the claims based on the policy's three-month qualifying period for cancer coverage.

In its ruling, AFCA noted that the policy had provisions to potentially waive the qualifying period if the policyholder could prove they were insured either under a previous TAL policy or by another insurer for the same events, right before their new coverage commenced.

The claimant contended that she had cancer coverage through an insurance policy provided by her husband's employer. She presented a letter from the employer affirming that she was covered under a "life, accident, critical illness, and medical insurance" scheme from August 2020 until June last year. Additionally, she showed documentation indicating her husband’s policy did include critical illness coverage for spouses, encompassing cancer.

While AFCA accepted the availability of this cancer coverage, it was not convinced that she held such coverage "immediately before the current policy began." It also noted she had failed to disclose her previous insurance when applying for the new policy with TAL Life.

"There is no information before me about the extent of the critical illness cover the complainant had, if any, through her husband's employer’s insurance arrangements," AFCA’s ombudsman stated.

"Furthermore, it appears that any cover she might have had ceased about a month before the new policy started. I am not convinced there was 'continuity of cover' as suggested by the complainant."

The ombudsman expressed AFCA’s sympathy towards the claimant, especially given that the diagnoses occurred "very close to the end of the qualifying period." Nonetheless, he emphasized that there was no valid reason for the qualifying period to be dismissed.

"The qualifying period is reasonably short and its existence is not unjust. These terms are part of all insurance policies and they draw necessary boundaries. The enforcement of these terms is not inherently unfair," the ombudsman elaborated.

For a more detailed account of the ruling, refer to the original report by AFCA.

Published:Wednesday, 4th Sep 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Cyclone Pool Delivers Some Relief for High-Risk Strata Schemes

05 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

The ACCC’s fifth and final insurance monitoring report has given strata committees in cyclone-exposed regions a clearer view of what the Cyclone Reinsurance Pool is-and is not-achieving. Released on 25 June 2026, the report found that the pool has helped reduce or moderate premiums for policyholders in higher cyclone-risk areas, including residential strata schemes. - read more

Renewal Notice Gaps Put Insurance Costs Back in Focus for Tradies

05 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian tradies know the pressure of keeping cover in place while juggling wages, materials, fuel, tax, vehicle costs and unpredictable cash flow. A new review by the General Insurance Code Governance Committee is a timely reminder that the way an insurance renewal is presented can make a real difference to what a small business owner understands, compares and ultimately pays. - read more

Mercer Super Fine Shows Why Life Cover Needs Regular Checks

05 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

A new Federal Court penalty against Mercer Super has put another spotlight on the systems that sit behind insurance held through superannuation. Mercer Super has been ordered to pay $10.3 million after failures to report internal investigations into significant member service issues to ASIC, including one matter involving insurance premiums that continued to be charged after members had died. - read more

H5 Bird Flu Detections: What Farm Operators Should Review Now

05 Jul 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s H5 bird flu situation has moved quickly, with authorities responding to new detections in migratory seabirds, including a confirmed case in New South Wales and further concerns in Western Australia. Importantly for producers, officials have continued to stress that there is currently no evidence of infection in poultry or the wider agricultural production system, and the public health risk remains low. - read more

Click for more Insurance News