Home Parking Dilemma Leads to Insurance Dispute Loss

2

The insurer, SGUAS, denied the claim based on a clause that excluded coverage for vehicles left on the street between 10pm and 5am. The woman's car was stolen at 2am from directly outside her house, with the thieves gaining access by breaking into her home and taking the keys.

According to a police report, the location of the car would not have deterred the thieves, who broke a window to enter the house. “Regardless of where the car was parked, the offenders would have successfully taken the vehicle," stated the report.

The car owner revealed that she bought her insurance through a broker and relied on him for managing all details. She admitted to frequently parking on the street because of the difficulty in maneuvering her car into the narrow driveway and carport of her new home.

During the investigation, her broker argued to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) that the car would have been stolen regardless of its parking spot. However, AFCA maintained that the insurer was not liable as the homeowner did not inform them of her regular street parking, a critical deviation from the declared parking arrangements.

AFCA's ombudsman expressed sympathy for the homeowner's plight but upheld the policy's exclusion for overnight street parking. "It seems this practice was established due to the inaccessible driveway, yet the policy clearly stipulates the necessity to inform the insurer of any such changes," the ombudsman noted.

"The homeowner consistently parked on the street overnight, thereby invalidating her insurance claim due to the policy's terms. The failure to communicate this change prejudiced the insurer’s ability to assess the risk properly, justifying the claim denial," the AFCA representative explained.

AFCA further noted that street parking significantly increases the risk of theft, a factor emphasized in the insurer’s underwriting guidelines. “Even though the thieves acted boldly, the information provided by the insurer indicates a higher theft risk for cars parked on the road,” it stated.

At the inception of the policy, the homeowner’s broker had conveyed detailed parking arrangements to the insurer, even providing a picture of the carport. Yet, this information became obsolete when the homeowner developed a habit of street parking without updating the insurer.

This case serves as a stark reminder of the crucial role precise adherence to insurance policy terms plays. Policyholders should communicate any changes in their circumstances to ensure their coverage remains valid. For more details, you can refer to the original ruling by AFCA.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Rising Insurance Premiums Challenge Australian SMEs 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across Australia are increasingly burdened by soaring insurance premiums, with many facing hikes of 30% or more within a single year. This surge has led some businesses to either reduce their coverage or forgo insurance altogether, exposing them to significant financial risks. - read more

Upcover's New Management Liability Insurance for SMEs 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Australian insurtech company Upcover has unveiled a new management liability insurance product designed specifically for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and sole traders. This offering aims to provide comprehensive protection against a range of risks that business owners may encounter. - read more

QBE Strengthens Cyber Insurance Offerings 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In response to the growing prevalence of cyber threats and increasingly stringent regulations, QBE Insurance has announced a strategic initiative to bolster its cyber insurance capabilities. This move aims to provide brokers and their clients with more robust support in navigating the complex landscape of cyber risks. - read more

Australian Insurers Report $1.11 Billion Profit in Q1 2025 29 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian insurance industry has reported a net profit after tax of $1.11 billion for the first quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). This figure includes contributions of $990 million from insurers and $123 million from reinsurers. The insurance service result, a key measure of underwriting performance, stood at $1.32 billion for the quarter, complemented by investment returns totaling $1.18 billion. - read more