Home Parking Dilemma Leads to Insurance Dispute Loss

2

The insurer, SGUAS, denied the claim based on a clause that excluded coverage for vehicles left on the street between 10pm and 5am. The woman's car was stolen at 2am from directly outside her house, with the thieves gaining access by breaking into her home and taking the keys.

According to a police report, the location of the car would not have deterred the thieves, who broke a window to enter the house. “Regardless of where the car was parked, the offenders would have successfully taken the vehicle," stated the report.

The car owner revealed that she bought her insurance through a broker and relied on him for managing all details. She admitted to frequently parking on the street because of the difficulty in maneuvering her car into the narrow driveway and carport of her new home.

During the investigation, her broker argued to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) that the car would have been stolen regardless of its parking spot. However, AFCA maintained that the insurer was not liable as the homeowner did not inform them of her regular street parking, a critical deviation from the declared parking arrangements.

AFCA's ombudsman expressed sympathy for the homeowner's plight but upheld the policy's exclusion for overnight street parking. "It seems this practice was established due to the inaccessible driveway, yet the policy clearly stipulates the necessity to inform the insurer of any such changes," the ombudsman noted.

"The homeowner consistently parked on the street overnight, thereby invalidating her insurance claim due to the policy's terms. The failure to communicate this change prejudiced the insurer’s ability to assess the risk properly, justifying the claim denial," the AFCA representative explained.

AFCA further noted that street parking significantly increases the risk of theft, a factor emphasized in the insurer’s underwriting guidelines. “Even though the thieves acted boldly, the information provided by the insurer indicates a higher theft risk for cars parked on the road,” it stated.

At the inception of the policy, the homeowner’s broker had conveyed detailed parking arrangements to the insurer, even providing a picture of the carport. Yet, this information became obsolete when the homeowner developed a habit of street parking without updating the insurer.

This case serves as a stark reminder of the crucial role precise adherence to insurance policy terms plays. Policyholders should communicate any changes in their circumstances to ensure their coverage remains valid. For more details, you can refer to the original ruling by AFCA.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Insurance Industry Calls for Liability Law Reforms as Costs Skyrocket for Entertainment Sectors 16 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) is advocating for comprehensive reforms in liability laws to tackle rising insurance premiums, particularly impacting sectors such as live music venues, festivals, caravan parks, and amusement venues. The call comes with the release of a white paper highlighting that outdated state-based civil liability laws, untouched for nearly 25 years, are inflating costs significantly. - read more

Surge in Profits for Australian Insurers Amid Rising Premiums 15 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori In 2024, Australia's insurance industry reported a collective after-tax profit of $6.1 billion, a significant increase from the five-year average of $2 billion. This surge is attributed to substantial premium hikes and a relatively quiet year for natural disasters. - read more

Rising Insurance Costs Challenge Australian Businesses Amid Crime Surge 15 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori Australian businesses are confronting escalating insurance premiums, driven by a surge in break-ins and thefts. This trend is placing additional financial strain on business owners already navigating a complex economic environment. - read more

Allianz Australia Penalised for Misleading Insurance Practices 15 Oct 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant regulatory development, Allianz Australia and its subsidiary, AWP Australia, have been fined $16.8 million for making false and misleading statements. This penalty underscores the critical importance of transparency and honesty in the insurance industry. - read more