Horse Accident Claim Rejected: A Deeper Look into Trauma Insurance
Horse Accident Claim Rejected: A Deeper Look into Trauma Insurance
The incident occurred on October 16 of the previous year, leading to a significant pelvic fracture for the claimant, followed by surgery a few days later. The woman has stated that her day-to-day activities have been severely affected as a result.
Currently, she is undergoing physiotherapy and taking medication to improve her mobility. Her orthopaedic surgeon, identified as Dr NJ, has reported that she exhibits "debilitating symptoms affecting her left leg and foot."
Despite these symptoms, Dr NJ remarked that it might take 18 to 24 months to see improvement, and confirmed that predicting a permanent condition is complex at this stage.
Clearview Life Assurance refused the claim, citing that their policy's "loss of independent existence" clause necessitates a permanent inability to perform at least two daily activities independently.
In June, the complainant's general physician noted that she requires crutches for mobility and is incapable of handling tasks such as shopping, laundry, food preparation, or housecleaning.
The claimant also stated she suffers from cognitive impairment and has not shown any nerve recovery since the incident. She contends it would be unreasonable to assume her condition will improve over time.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) acknowledged the severity of her disability but indicated that the current medical advice suggests she could eventually recover.
"Dr NJ is in the best position to opine on the permanence of the disability, given his specialty and ongoing treatment of the complainant," AFCA noted. "He has said it's 'too early to declare a permanent condition' and has outlined the further testing and treatments that are in progress and planned."
Nonetheless, AFCA's decision leaves the door open for the claimant to present new medical evidence at a future point that might confirm the permanence of her disability.
"It may be possible for her to demonstrate with subsequent medical evidence that her disability is permanent," AFCA said. "However, based on the current evidence, I am not convinced her disability is permanent or irreversible."
This case offers a critical view into the complexities and challenges associated with trauma insurance claims and highlights the necessity for clear and definite medical proof in establishing the permanence of a condition.
Published:Tuesday, 1st Oct 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Court Denies E-Scooter Negligence Allegation Against City Council 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian court recently ruled in favour of the City of Joondalup, rejecting a negligence claim lodged by an injured e-scooter rider. The Western Australia District Court found the city not liable for an accident involving insurance broker Kirstin Leibbrandt, who collided with a fence post while riding an e-scooter in the Perth suburb of Hillarys. - read more |
| Mental Health Surpasses Other Causes in TPD Claims, Doubling Payouts Over Five Years 14 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori Recent findings from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) reveal that mental health issues have become the primary cause of Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims. Insurers disbursed nearly twice the amount for such claims in 2024 compared to five years prior. This data originates from the CALI and KPMG's Cause of Claims Results Report, highlighting a significant shift in the nature of insurance claims. - read more |
| Impact of Trump Tariffs on Global Insurance Industry 11 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori According to Swiss Re’s latest Sigma report, the growth of property and casualty premiums is moderating in both Australia and globally. This moderation is primarily driven by a slowdown in rate hikes. Additionally, the Trump administration's America First trade policy is putting further pressure on the insurance sector. - read more |
| Navigating Changes in Australia's Life Insurance Advice Landscape 10 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The conversation on the shifting dynamics in Australia's life insurance advice sector featured Zurich Australia's head of adviser channel, Kieran Forde, and Hayes & Co director, Katherine Hayes. They engaged with editor Chris Dastoor to spotlight the current market conditions and future prospects for financial advisers in this domain. - read more |
| The Myth of Unaffordability: How to Find Value in Income Insurance Policies Income protection insurance is often surrounded by the myth of being unaffordable, deterring many Australians from safeguarding their most valuable asset—their ability to earn. This introduction aims to address this misconception head on, revealing the real value that income insurance policies can provide. It is crucial to understand that the cost of such a policy pales in comparison to the potential financial hardship faced without one. - read more
|
| Understanding Life Insurance: How to Get the Best Online Quotes The digital age has fundamentally transformed how we approach almost every aspect of our lives, including the way we shop for life insurance in Australia. Gone are the days when one had to schedule meetings with insurance agents or flip through pamphlets to understand life insurance policies. Today, obtaining life insurance quotes online has become the norm, offering a hassle-free and incredibly accessible platform for individuals to safeguard their financial future. - read more
|
| How Life Insurance Provides Financial Security for Your Loved Ones Life insurance is a crucial part of any comprehensive financial plan, providing peace of mind that your loved ones will be financially secure in the event of your passing. - read more
|
| Income Protection Insurance: A Must-Have for Australian Adults Insurance is a crucial component of financial planning. While many Australians understand the importance of life insurance, there's another vital type of coverage that often gets overlooked: income protection insurance. - read more
|
The process by which an insurance company seeks to recover the amount paid to the policyholder from a third party responsible for the loss.