Compare Life Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

An intriguing dispute has led Southern Cross Travel Insurance (SCTI) to persist with processing a travel claim even when confronted with a claimant's refusal to allow access to personal information under usual terms.

The claim originates from an incident in January when the traveler's belongings, including a bag, were stolen during an overseas trip. In response, SCTI requested a standard consent from the policyholder to acquire "any further information reasonably required" for their investigations.

The claimant, however, raised privacy concerns and proposed a modified consent form. His version mandated that SCTI summarize any information they intended to retrieve and secure written consent before sharing it with third parties.

Insisting on his privacy, the claimant also declined to share his phone number, preferring to handle communications through email, which SCTI found insufficient for the investigation process.

The insurer argued that under the terms and conditions agreed upon by the policyholder at the time of purchase, such an authorization was necessary to ensure comprehensive investigations without any limitations. SCTI warned they could not advance the claim unless the policyholder complied with their request.

On the contrary, the claimant contended that his modifications wouldn't hinder SCTI's access but would merely control the flow of his personal data. He asserted it was unreasonable for SCTI to gather information without his explicit acknowledgment, citing concerns over what he termed as "easily breachable" information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with the claimant, emphasizing the need to balance the claimant’s privacy with the insurer's requirement for a thorough investigation.

AFCA noted that SCTI’s request was quite broad, lacking specificity about the necessity of each piece of information. The authority pointed out SCTI's failure to demonstrate any substantial prejudice caused by limiting authority over the claimant's information.

"While requesting limited authority/ies from the complainant presents a greater administrative and time burden for the insurer, it has not shown that doing so would inhibit its ability to investigate the claim or is otherwise unworkable or particularly onerous," the ombudsman remarked.

The ombudsman further commented, "In the absence of the insurer providing reasons to the contrary, the complainant is entitled to know the parties to whom information is being provided to and sought from, its scope, and the opportunity to consent to each."

Thus, SCTI cannot delay claim assessments on the grounds of incomplete standard authorization forms, obliging them to provide the claimant with forms that recognize his conditions.

AFCA also determined that while the claimant may continue using email for routine communication, he must supply his phone number or relevant phone records if deemed vital to the investigation. This case underlines the evolving dynamics between privacy rights and corporate processes, as reported by Insurance News.

Published:Monday, 25th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Significant Increase in Health Insurance Premiums Anticipated for 2026 Significant Increase in Health Insurance Premiums Anticipated for 2026
21 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Health insurance premiums are set to experience a substantial increase in 2026, with projections indicating a global rise of 10.3%. This marks the third consecutive year of significant hikes, following increases of 10% in 2025 and 9.5% in 2024. These figures are highlighted in WTW's 2026 Global Medical Trends report, underscoring the persistent inflationary pressures affecting insurers and employer-sponsored health plans worldwide. - read more
Private Health Insurers Under Scrutiny for Profits Amid Rising Premiums Private Health Insurers Under Scrutiny for Profits Amid Rising Premiums
21 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent analyses have brought to light significant concerns regarding the profit margins of private health insurers in Australia, especially in the context of rising premiums. The Australia Institute has highlighted that major insurers are reporting substantial profits while simultaneously increasing premiums, a situation that has sparked criticism and calls for greater transparency within the industry. - read more
Health Minister Puts Private Health Insurers on Notice Over Pricing Practices Health Minister Puts Private Health Insurers on Notice Over Pricing Practices
21 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

Health Minister Mark Butler has issued a stern warning to private health insurers in Australia, cautioning them against employing underhanded tactics to increase premiums. This comes in response to findings from the Commonwealth Ombudsman, which revealed that some insurers have been closing old policies and introducing more expensive new ones, effectively circumventing regulatory limits on premium hikes. - read more
AUSactive Unveils Comprehensive Insurance Solution for Fitness Professionals AUSactive Unveils Comprehensive Insurance Solution for Fitness Professionals
21 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori

AUSactive, Australia's leading body for the exercise and active health sector, has announced the launch of a new insurance product tailored specifically for fitness professionals. This initiative, developed in collaboration with global insurance broker Marsh, aims to provide enhanced protection while offering lower premiums compared to existing market options. - read more


Life Insurance Articles

Income Protection vs. Total Permanent Disability: Which Is Right for You? Income Protection vs. Total Permanent Disability: Which Is Right for You?
Financial security is crucial in today's unpredictable world, where unexpected events can disrupt the stability and comfort of our daily lives. For Australians, protecting one's income and lifestyle from unforeseen circumstances is a key component of personal finance. - read more
Understanding the Differences: Income Protection vs Total and Permanent Disability Insurance Understanding the Differences: Income Protection vs Total and Permanent Disability Insurance
Income protection insurance is a type of policy that provides financial support to individuals who are unable to work due to an illness or injury. The insurance company will pay a portion of the policyholder's earnings, which can be used to cover everyday living expenses and bills. This type of insurance is different from total and permanent disability insurance (TPD) in a few key ways. - read more
Decoding the Fine Print: What to Look out for in Your Income Protection Policy Decoding the Fine Print: What to Look out for in Your Income Protection Policy
Income protection insurance serves as a vital safety net for Australian workers, ensuring financial stability in the face of unexpected illness or injury. As the landscape of work and health continues to evolve, understanding the essentials of income protection becomes increasingly crucial for anyone who relies on a steady income to support themselves and their loved ones. - read more
Why Income Protection Insurance is Essential for Self-Employed Australians Why Income Protection Insurance is Essential for Self-Employed Australians
Income protection insurance is a type of coverage designed to provide you with a steady income if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. Unlike other types of insurance, which may focus on lump-sum payments, income protection insurance prioritises regular income replacement to help cover your everyday expenses. - read more


Start Here !
life insurance
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

Start Here

Life Cover Amount:
Postcode:


All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.
Knowledgebase
Insurance Claim:
Notification to an insurance company requesting payment of an amount due under the terms of the policy.