Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

3

The claim originates from an incident in January when the traveler's belongings, including a bag, were stolen during an overseas trip. In response, SCTI requested a standard consent from the policyholder to acquire "any further information reasonably required" for their investigations.

The claimant, however, raised privacy concerns and proposed a modified consent form. His version mandated that SCTI summarize any information they intended to retrieve and secure written consent before sharing it with third parties.

Insisting on his privacy, the claimant also declined to share his phone number, preferring to handle communications through email, which SCTI found insufficient for the investigation process.

The insurer argued that under the terms and conditions agreed upon by the policyholder at the time of purchase, such an authorization was necessary to ensure comprehensive investigations without any limitations. SCTI warned they could not advance the claim unless the policyholder complied with their request.

On the contrary, the claimant contended that his modifications wouldn't hinder SCTI's access but would merely control the flow of his personal data. He asserted it was unreasonable for SCTI to gather information without his explicit acknowledgment, citing concerns over what he termed as "easily breachable" information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with the claimant, emphasizing the need to balance the claimant’s privacy with the insurer's requirement for a thorough investigation.

AFCA noted that SCTI’s request was quite broad, lacking specificity about the necessity of each piece of information. The authority pointed out SCTI's failure to demonstrate any substantial prejudice caused by limiting authority over the claimant's information.

"While requesting limited authority/ies from the complainant presents a greater administrative and time burden for the insurer, it has not shown that doing so would inhibit its ability to investigate the claim or is otherwise unworkable or particularly onerous," the ombudsman remarked.

The ombudsman further commented, "In the absence of the insurer providing reasons to the contrary, the complainant is entitled to know the parties to whom information is being provided to and sought from, its scope, and the opportunity to consent to each."

Thus, SCTI cannot delay claim assessments on the grounds of incomplete standard authorization forms, obliging them to provide the claimant with forms that recognize his conditions.

AFCA also determined that while the claimant may continue using email for routine communication, he must supply his phone number or relevant phone records if deemed vital to the investigation. This case underlines the evolving dynamics between privacy rights and corporate processes, as reported by Insurance News.

Published:Monday, 25th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Marinex Underwriting Sets Sail in Australian Marine Insurance Market 27 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant development for Australia's marine insurance sector, Rhodian Group has announced the launch of Marinex Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialised marine insurance products tailored to the Australian market. This initiative marks Rhodian's third agency launch, following the establishment of Halo Underwriting and Batch Underwriting in previous years. - read more

Club Marine Marks 65 Years of Leadership in Australian Boating Insurance 27 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Club Marine, Australia's largest recreational boat insurer, is celebrating its 65th anniversary in 2024. Since its founding in 1959 as Marine Hull & Liability, the company has grown from a small operation in Victoria to a nationwide provider of insurance services for the country's boating community. - read more

Northern Australian Marinas Struggle with Rising Insurance Costs 27 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Marina operators in Northern Australia are confronting a significant crisis as insurance premiums escalate dramatically, with some experiencing increases exceeding 300% over recent years. This surge in costs is placing immense financial strain on the industry, prompting urgent calls for government intervention. - read more

Surge in Mental Health Claims Reshapes Australia's Life Insurance Landscape 26 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Australia's life insurance sector is witnessing a significant transformation, with mental health conditions emerging as the predominant cause of Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) claims. Recent data from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) indicates that mental health-related TPD claims now constitute nearly one-third of all such claims, highlighting a profound shift in the factors leading Australians to exit the workforce permanently. - read more