Privacy Rights Prevail: Claimant Sets Precedent in Insurance Information Access Dispute

3

The claim originates from an incident in January when the traveler's belongings, including a bag, were stolen during an overseas trip. In response, SCTI requested a standard consent from the policyholder to acquire "any further information reasonably required" for their investigations.

The claimant, however, raised privacy concerns and proposed a modified consent form. His version mandated that SCTI summarize any information they intended to retrieve and secure written consent before sharing it with third parties.

Insisting on his privacy, the claimant also declined to share his phone number, preferring to handle communications through email, which SCTI found insufficient for the investigation process.

The insurer argued that under the terms and conditions agreed upon by the policyholder at the time of purchase, such an authorization was necessary to ensure comprehensive investigations without any limitations. SCTI warned they could not advance the claim unless the policyholder complied with their request.

On the contrary, the claimant contended that his modifications wouldn't hinder SCTI's access but would merely control the flow of his personal data. He asserted it was unreasonable for SCTI to gather information without his explicit acknowledgment, citing concerns over what he termed as "easily breachable" information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with the claimant, emphasizing the need to balance the claimant’s privacy with the insurer's requirement for a thorough investigation.

AFCA noted that SCTI’s request was quite broad, lacking specificity about the necessity of each piece of information. The authority pointed out SCTI's failure to demonstrate any substantial prejudice caused by limiting authority over the claimant's information.

"While requesting limited authority/ies from the complainant presents a greater administrative and time burden for the insurer, it has not shown that doing so would inhibit its ability to investigate the claim or is otherwise unworkable or particularly onerous," the ombudsman remarked.

The ombudsman further commented, "In the absence of the insurer providing reasons to the contrary, the complainant is entitled to know the parties to whom information is being provided to and sought from, its scope, and the opportunity to consent to each."

Thus, SCTI cannot delay claim assessments on the grounds of incomplete standard authorization forms, obliging them to provide the claimant with forms that recognize his conditions.

AFCA also determined that while the claimant may continue using email for routine communication, he must supply his phone number or relevant phone records if deemed vital to the investigation. This case underlines the evolving dynamics between privacy rights and corporate processes, as reported by Insurance News.

Published:Monday, 25th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

CHU Unveils Enhanced Residential Strata Insurance Policy 06 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has announced the launch of a new residential strata insurance policy designed to better support property owners and strata communities. This initiative reflects CHU's commitment to delivering customer-focused solutions that simplify insurance processes and enhance community resilience. - read more

Sure Insurance Boosts Strata Coverage to $20 Million 06 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Sure Insurance has announced a significant expansion of its residential strata insurance coverage, increasing the replacement value limit from $5 million to $20 million. This strategic move is designed to address the affordability crisis and improve access to insurance for apartment complexes in Northern and Regional Queensland. - read more

ICA Advocates for Strata Law Reforms to Mitigate Rising Insurance Costs in Victoria 06 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has called for significant reforms to Victoria's strata legislation, citing a direct link between inadequate governance and escalating insurance premiums for residents. With approximately one in five Victorians living in strata-titled properties, the need for effective management and oversight has become increasingly critical. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Risk Preparedness 06 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey reveal that Australian insurers are falling behind their global counterparts in terms of risk preparedness. This lag is particularly concerning as the industry faces escalating challenges from cyber threats and the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI). - read more