Compare Life Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment

Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment

Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

In a recent ruling, a salon owner successfully contested a claim with her insurance provider concerning a dispute over a laser machine.
This case highlights significant issues around insurance policy interpretation and customer rights.

The crux of the dispute arose when the salon's laser machine broke down in February, and repair costs were estimated at $18,069. The salon owner had insured the machine for $50,000 in December of the previous year, following its second-hand purchase and refurbishment in 2012 for $66,000.

Despite acknowledging the damage, QBE Insurance reduced its compensation to $7,286, citing an underinsurance clause. QBE claimed that due to the model being discontinued, a replacement would necessitate insuring at $155,000.

The insurer's clause stipulated that if the sum insured was less than 80% of the "total new replacement value," the liability could be adjusted accordingly. However, the salon owner challenged this assessment, arguing that a comparable refurbished machine was valued between $30,000 and $45,000.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, siding with the salon owner. AFCA declared that policy wording began ambiguous, noting discrepancies in terms such as "full value" and "total new replacement value", creating confusion about the clause's intent.

AFCA clarified: "When the policy is read as a whole, it indicates the laser should be insured for its full value, or what it would cost to replace with a similar laser in a similar condition." They refuted QBE's expectation that the salon owner should have insured the laser for $155,000, indicating she would never recoup more than $50,000 under policy terms.

This ruling mandates QBE to cover the repair costs, less the policy’s deductible. The case emphasizes the importance of clarity in insurance contracts and equitable treatment of claims.



Published:Wednesday, 27th Nov 2024
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

Fair Work Commission Enforces Fuel Cost Recovery Measures for Transport Operators
Fair Work Commission Enforces Fuel Cost Recovery Measures for Transport Operators
01 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has implemented a mandatory fuel cost recovery order, effective from 21 April 2026, to address the escalating fuel expenses burdening Australia's transport sector. This directive mandates that all parties within the road transport contract chain adjust their rates fortnightly or bi-monthly, ensuring that transport operators can recuperate the increased fuel costs incurred since 6 March 2026. - read more
Trucking Industry Seeks Immediate Support to Mitigate Fuel Price Impact
Trucking Industry Seeks Immediate Support to Mitigate Fuel Price Impact
01 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian trucking industry is facing unprecedented challenges as soaring fuel prices threaten the viability of many transport operators. Industry leaders are urgently calling for financial relief measures to prevent widespread business closures and maintain the integrity of the nation's supply chain. - read more
Regulatory Bodies Advocate for TPD Insurance Reforms Amid Mental Health Claim Surge
Regulatory Bodies Advocate for TPD Insurance Reforms Amid Mental Health Claim Surge
01 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori
In a recent joint CEO roundtable, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) highlighted pressing concerns regarding Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance. The discussion centered on the escalating frequency and complexity of mental health-related claims, which are exerting significant pressure on both insurers and policyholders. - read more
Analyzing the 2026-27 Federal Budget's Impact on Australia's Insurance Industry
Analyzing the 2026-27 Federal Budget's Impact on Australia's Insurance Industry
01 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori
The 2026-27 Federal Budget, presented by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, introduces several measures with direct implications for Australia's insurance sector. Notably, the budget addresses concerns related to property insurance costs and the issue of underinsurance, both of which are critical for tradespeople and small business owners. - read more


Life Insurance Articles



Start Here !
life insurance
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

Start Here

Life Cover Amount:
Postcode:


All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.
Knowledgebase
Loss of Use:
Insurance coverage that pays for the additional living expenses if your home is uninhabitable due to a covered loss.