Customer Wins in Insurance Dispute Over Laser Equipment

The crux of the dispute arose when the salon's laser machine broke down in February, and repair costs were estimated at $18,069. The salon owner had insured the machine for $50,000 in December of the previous year, following its second-hand purchase and refurbishment in 2012 for $66,000.

Despite acknowledging the damage, QBE Insurance reduced its compensation to $7,286, citing an underinsurance clause. QBE claimed that due to the model being discontinued, a replacement would necessitate insuring at $155,000.

The insurer's clause stipulated that if the sum insured was less than 80% of the "total new replacement value," the liability could be adjusted accordingly. However, the salon owner challenged this assessment, arguing that a comparable refurbished machine was valued between $30,000 and $45,000.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) intervened, siding with the salon owner. AFCA declared that policy wording began ambiguous, noting discrepancies in terms such as "full value" and "total new replacement value", creating confusion about the clause's intent.

AFCA clarified: "When the policy is read as a whole, it indicates the laser should be insured for its full value, or what it would cost to replace with a similar laser in a similar condition." They refuted QBE's expectation that the salon owner should have insured the laser for $155,000, indicating she would never recoup more than $50,000 under policy terms.

This ruling mandates QBE to cover the repair costs, less the policy’s deductible. The case emphasizes the importance of clarity in insurance contracts and equitable treatment of claims.

Published:Wednesday, 27th Nov 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Regulatory Review of Life Insurance Premium Practices in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In June 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) provided an update on their joint review of life insurance premium practices. This initiative was prompted by concerns over frequent and substantial premium increases that may not align with policy terms or policyholder expectations. - read more

Ongoing Deficiencies in Direct Life Insurance Sales Practices Identified by ASIC 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In August 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released findings from a review of direct life insurance sales practices, uncovering persistent deficiencies despite previous regulatory interventions. - read more

Swiss Re Suspends New Life Insurance Operations in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Swiss Re Life & Health Australia has announced a suspension of new life insurance business activities in the country, effective October 2025. This decision stems from concerns over the sustainability of Total Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance products, which have seen a significant rise in claims, particularly related to mental health. - read more

AIA Australia Highlights Need for Structural Reform in Life Insurance 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Damien Mu, CEO of AIA Australia, has raised concerns about the sustainability of the current life insurance model, citing a significant increase in mental health claims and economic volatility. Speaking at the company's recent Thrive for Life presentation, Mu emphasised that the industry is facing structural changes driven by these factors. - read more