Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause

2

The situation began when the policyholder purchased travel insurance for a family holiday scheduled to begin on December 12, 2023. Shortly after arriving in the U.S., the man was informed of his sister-in-law's critical health decline due to metastatic colorectal cancer. He returned home to be with her in her final days, later resuming his vacation on December 23.

However, upon claiming for the abrupt change in travel plans, the insurer, AWP Australia, denied the claim. They stated that the policy explicitly excluded coverage for incidents related to pre-existing medical conditions of the insured’s relatives. The sister-in-law’s diagnosis of cancer and a pulmonary embolism had been established for nearly a year prior to the start of the policy coverage.

The case highlights a common oversight among travelers: not accounting for family members' significant medical histories while planning their travels. Even though the policy allowed for early return and resumption of journey benefits, these did not apply as the sister-in-law's health condition predated the travel insurance policy.

The policyholder argued that the policy had not explicitly required him to disclose his sister-in-law’s medical background, which he felt was unfair. He also mentioned experiencing substantial financial hardship due to the rejection of his claim. Nevertheless, AFCA supported the insurer's decision.

In summarizing the decision, the AFCA ombudsman stated, “I acknowledge the complainant was not aware that [his sister-in-law] may fall seriously ill and pass away when he commenced his holiday. However, I am satisfied the exchanged information shows death was caused by her pre-existing medical conditions for the purposes of the policy. In the absence of any other information, I am satisfied the insurer is entitled to deny the claim.”

This resolution accentuates the criticality of reading and comprehending the exclusions present in travel insurance policies. Policyholders should be fully aware of what constitutes a pre-existing condition and how it may impact claim eligibility. The case serves as a cautionary tale for travellers to ensure all potential scenarios are accounted for in their insurance coverage. For further details, you can refer to the ruling as noted by Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

Published:Wednesday, 22nd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

WFI Insurance's $250,000 Donation Supports Flood-Affected Queensland Farmers 30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In response to the catastrophic flooding that has devastated parts of western Queensland, WFI Insurance has stepped forward with a substantial donation of $250,000 to Rural Aid. This contribution is aimed at bolstering relief efforts for farming communities grappling with the aftermath of the region's most severe floods in half a century. - read more

AFCA Supports Significant Home Insurance Premium Increase Based on Updated Flood Risk Assessment 30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently upheld a substantial increase in home insurance premiums for a property, attributing the rise to updated assessments of flood risk. This decision underscores the critical role of accurate risk evaluation in determining insurance costs and the necessity for property owners to stay informed about potential changes in their risk profiles. - read more

Envest Group's TLI Underwriting: A New Era for Large Truck Fleet Insurance 30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Envest Group, a prominent player in the insurance industry, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new heavy motor agency set to commence operations at the end of this month. TLI Underwriting will function as an authorised representative of Envest's heavy motor specialist underwriter, ATL Insurance Group. - read more

AFCA's Decision Highlights Importance of Accurate Insurance Declarations 30 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled against a trucking company that misrepresented its insurance history and operational details when obtaining a policy from NTI. This decision underscores the critical importance of providing accurate information during the insurance application process. - read more