Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause

2

The situation began when the policyholder purchased travel insurance for a family holiday scheduled to begin on December 12, 2023. Shortly after arriving in the U.S., the man was informed of his sister-in-law's critical health decline due to metastatic colorectal cancer. He returned home to be with her in her final days, later resuming his vacation on December 23.

However, upon claiming for the abrupt change in travel plans, the insurer, AWP Australia, denied the claim. They stated that the policy explicitly excluded coverage for incidents related to pre-existing medical conditions of the insured’s relatives. The sister-in-law’s diagnosis of cancer and a pulmonary embolism had been established for nearly a year prior to the start of the policy coverage.

The case highlights a common oversight among travelers: not accounting for family members' significant medical histories while planning their travels. Even though the policy allowed for early return and resumption of journey benefits, these did not apply as the sister-in-law's health condition predated the travel insurance policy.

The policyholder argued that the policy had not explicitly required him to disclose his sister-in-law’s medical background, which he felt was unfair. He also mentioned experiencing substantial financial hardship due to the rejection of his claim. Nevertheless, AFCA supported the insurer's decision.

In summarizing the decision, the AFCA ombudsman stated, “I acknowledge the complainant was not aware that [his sister-in-law] may fall seriously ill and pass away when he commenced his holiday. However, I am satisfied the exchanged information shows death was caused by her pre-existing medical conditions for the purposes of the policy. In the absence of any other information, I am satisfied the insurer is entitled to deny the claim.”

This resolution accentuates the criticality of reading and comprehending the exclusions present in travel insurance policies. Policyholders should be fully aware of what constitutes a pre-existing condition and how it may impact claim eligibility. The case serves as a cautionary tale for travellers to ensure all potential scenarios are accounted for in their insurance coverage. For further details, you can refer to the ruling as noted by Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

Published:Wednesday, 22nd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Queensland's Persistent Flood Woes: A Call for Resilient Rebuilding 05 Feb 2025: Paige Estritori The recent floods in northern Queensland have left a significant mark, with the Insurance Council of Australia reporting 1,435 insurance claims following the heavy rains. As the weather slowly begins to clear, residents of Townsville have started returning home, heaving a sigh of relief as the city narrowly avoided severe flooding. - read more

ACCC Scrutinizes Major Motor Insurance Mergers 05 Feb 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has opened a detailed examination into significant mergers in the motor insurance market. The acquisitions under review include Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) endeavor to acquire RACQ Insurance and Allianz Australia's agreement to purchase RAA Insurance. - read more

Urgency in Financial Reform: A Call for Swift Action 04 Feb 2025: Paige Estritori Christine Cupitt, CEO of the Council of Australian Life Insurers, has strongly expressed the urgent need for rapid legislative reform in financial advice. With an upcoming election threatening to stall legislation, time is of the essence to ensure timely implementation. - read more

North Queensland Faces Swift Response Amid Devastating Floods 03 Feb 2025: Paige Estritori North Queensland is grappling with severe floods due to torrential rains, prompting the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) to declare the situation a significant event. The worst-hit regions include Townsville and Ingham, where the impact has been profound. - read more