Travel Insurance Dispute Highlights Pre-Existing Condition Clause

2

The situation began when the policyholder purchased travel insurance for a family holiday scheduled to begin on December 12, 2023. Shortly after arriving in the U.S., the man was informed of his sister-in-law's critical health decline due to metastatic colorectal cancer. He returned home to be with her in her final days, later resuming his vacation on December 23.

However, upon claiming for the abrupt change in travel plans, the insurer, AWP Australia, denied the claim. They stated that the policy explicitly excluded coverage for incidents related to pre-existing medical conditions of the insured’s relatives. The sister-in-law’s diagnosis of cancer and a pulmonary embolism had been established for nearly a year prior to the start of the policy coverage.

The case highlights a common oversight among travelers: not accounting for family members' significant medical histories while planning their travels. Even though the policy allowed for early return and resumption of journey benefits, these did not apply as the sister-in-law's health condition predated the travel insurance policy.

The policyholder argued that the policy had not explicitly required him to disclose his sister-in-law’s medical background, which he felt was unfair. He also mentioned experiencing substantial financial hardship due to the rejection of his claim. Nevertheless, AFCA supported the insurer's decision.

In summarizing the decision, the AFCA ombudsman stated, “I acknowledge the complainant was not aware that [his sister-in-law] may fall seriously ill and pass away when he commenced his holiday. However, I am satisfied the exchanged information shows death was caused by her pre-existing medical conditions for the purposes of the policy. In the absence of any other information, I am satisfied the insurer is entitled to deny the claim.”

This resolution accentuates the criticality of reading and comprehending the exclusions present in travel insurance policies. Policyholders should be fully aware of what constitutes a pre-existing condition and how it may impact claim eligibility. The case serves as a cautionary tale for travellers to ensure all potential scenarios are accounted for in their insurance coverage. For further details, you can refer to the ruling as noted by Australian Financial Complaints Authority.

Published:Wednesday, 22nd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Leadership Transition at NTI: Janelle Greene Named New CEO 13 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori National Transport Insurance (NTI), Australia's premier transport and logistics insurance provider, has announced the appointment of Janelle Greene as its new Chief Executive Officer, effective July 1. Greene, who currently serves as NTI's Chief Customer Officer, will succeed Tony Clark, who has led the company for the past 18 years. - read more

Decade-Long Battle Ends in TPD Payout for Injured Truck Driver 13 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a truck driver has been awarded a total and permanent disability (TPD) benefit, concluding a protracted dispute that spanned over a decade. - read more

NHVR's Revised Master Code: Broader Safety Guidelines for Heavy Vehicle Users 13 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) has recently updated its Master Code of Practice, marking the first revision since its initial release in 2018. This comprehensive update extends its reach beyond traditional road transport businesses to encompass a wider array of industries that utilise heavy vehicles, including manufacturing, construction, mining, retail, and logistics. - read more

AFCA Upholds Policyholder's Income Protection Benefits Against Zurich 12 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled against Zurich Insurance, instructing the insurer to maintain the current income protection benefits for a policyholder after an 11-year delay in proposing a reduction. This decision underscores the critical importance of timely and transparent communication between insurers and their clients. - read more