Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Regulatory Review of Life Insurance Premium Practices in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In June 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) provided an update on their joint review of life insurance premium practices. This initiative was prompted by concerns over frequent and substantial premium increases that may not align with policy terms or policyholder expectations. - read more

Ongoing Deficiencies in Direct Life Insurance Sales Practices Identified by ASIC 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori In August 2025, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released findings from a review of direct life insurance sales practices, uncovering persistent deficiencies despite previous regulatory interventions. - read more

Swiss Re Suspends New Life Insurance Operations in Australia 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Swiss Re Life & Health Australia has announced a suspension of new life insurance business activities in the country, effective October 2025. This decision stems from concerns over the sustainability of Total Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance products, which have seen a significant rise in claims, particularly related to mental health. - read more

AIA Australia Highlights Need for Structural Reform in Life Insurance 01 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Damien Mu, CEO of AIA Australia, has raised concerns about the sustainability of the current life insurance model, citing a significant increase in mental health claims and economic volatility. Speaking at the company's recent Thrive for Life presentation, Mu emphasised that the industry is facing structural changes driven by these factors. - read more