Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

1

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

ICA Proposes Measures to Mitigate Escalating Motor Insurance Premiums 09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has released a policy paper titled 'Motor Insurance Policy Paper – A Roadmap for Reducing Rising Premiums,' highlighting the urgent need for coordinated action to address systemic cost drivers behind the 42% increase in comprehensive motor insurance premiums since 2019. - read more

Budget Direct Triumphs as Australia's Top Insurer in 2026 09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In a remarkable achievement, Budget Direct has been honoured as the inaugural 'Insurer of the Year' at the 2026 Finder Provider of the Year Awards. This prestigious recognition underscores the company's unwavering commitment to delivering exceptional value and service to Australian policyholders. - read more

Australian Insurers Face Challenges in Cyber Risk Readiness 09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori Recent findings from the PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey have raised concerns about the preparedness of Australian insurers in managing emerging risks, particularly in the realms of cyber security and artificial intelligence (AI). The survey indicates that Australian insurers scored 6.6% lower on the Preparedness Index compared to their global counterparts, highlighting a significant gap in readiness. - read more

Significant Decline in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates 09 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori In a notable development for the Australian insurance market, commercial insurance rates experienced a substantial decline of 12% in the fourth quarter of 2025. This decrease, as reported by Marsh's Global Insurance Market Index, represents the most significant drop among the eight regions monitored and marks the steepest reduction since the Pacific rates began to decrease in early 2024. - read more