Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

APRA's Intervention: Freezing Unjustified Premium Hikes in Commercial Auto Insurance 06 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently taken decisive action to address escalating concerns within the commercial auto insurance sector. In response to widespread industry protests over substantial premium increases, APRA has implemented emergency regulations aimed at protecting independent transport operators and logistics enterprises from potential financial distress. - read more

Navigating 2026: Key Challenges Identified by Australian Insurers 06 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori As 2026 unfolds, Australian insurers are confronting a trio of pressing challenges that are reshaping the industry's landscape. According to insights from Gallagher Bassett's upcoming report, 'The Carrier Perspective: 2026 Claims Insights,' the foremost concerns include rising premium costs coupled with shrinking insurability, escalating cyber and data risks, and increasing difficulties in attracting and retaining skilled workers. - read more

Addressing the Looming Truck Driver Shortage in Australia 06 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Australia's transport industry is sounding the alarm over a significant and growing shortage of truck drivers, a situation that poses a substantial threat to the nation's supply chain. The National Road Transport Association (NatRoad) has highlighted that the current shortfall of approximately 28,000 drivers is projected to escalate to 78,000 unfilled positions by 2029, representing a 26% decrease from the current workforce of 189,900 drivers. - read more

APRA Emphasises Immediate Action on Extreme Weather Mitigation 06 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a pivotal report highlighting the pressing need for immediate and substantial action to shield communities from the escalating impacts of extreme weather events. This Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment (ICVA) serves as a stress test, modelling potential future scenarios rather than forecasting specific outcomes. However, the risks outlined are already becoming evident, reinforcing the insurance industry's calls for urgent intervention to mitigate extreme weather risks. - read more