Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Surge in Insurance Complaints Highlights Processing Delays 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Recent data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reveals a significant increase in consumer complaints against insurance companies, reaching an unprecedented average of 100 complaints per day. This surge is primarily attributed to delays in processing routine claims, rather than issues stemming from natural disasters. - read more

Cyber Threats Expose Gaps in Australian Insurers' Preparedness 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The latest PwC Insurance Banana Skins Survey highlights a concerning trend: Australian insurers are trailing their global counterparts in preparedness for emerging risks, particularly in the realms of cyber threats and artificial intelligence (AI). This gap raises questions about the industry's resilience and its ability to adapt to rapidly evolving technological challenges. - read more

Market Concentration in Australian Insurance: A Double-Edged Sword 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori Australia's general insurance market is notably concentrated, with four major companies—Insurance Australia Group (IAG), Suncorp, QBE, and Allianz—controlling approximately 74% of the market. This dominance has sparked discussions about the potential implications for competition and consumer outcomes. - read more

Life Insurers Advocate for Updated Code of Practice 21 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian life insurance industry is actively supporting revisions to the Life Insurance Code of Practice, aiming to align with evolving regulatory requirements and consumer expectations. This initiative underscores the sector's commitment to maintaining trust and relevance in a dynamic environment. - read more