Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Australian Insurers Tackle Premium Affordability Challenges in 2026 31 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In 2026, Australian insurers are prioritizing premium affordability and insurability as they confront escalating claims costs, climate-related losses, and technology-enabled fraud. According to Gallagher Bassett's 2026 global claims study, these factors are significantly influencing pricing, underwriting, and capital allocation decisions. - read more

Medibank's Profit Surge Amidst Rising Health Insurance Premiums 31 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori Medibank Private, one of Australia's leading health insurers, has reported a significant increase in its interim net profit, coinciding with a notable rise in health insurance premiums across the country. This development has sparked discussions about the affordability and value of private health insurance for Australian consumers. - read more

TAL's 'Pathways': A New Digital Solution for Mental Health Claims 31 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori In a significant move to improve the claims process for mental health-related income protection, Australian life insurer TAL has announced the development of a new digital platform named 'Pathways.' This initiative is a collaborative effort involving the Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre, the University of Sydney, and Workcom, aiming to streamline and enhance the experience for policyholders navigating mental health claims. - read more

ASIC Takes Legal Action Against Budget Direct Over Discount Misrepresentation 31 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced legal proceedings against Auto & General, the parent company of Budget Direct, alleging that the insurer misled customers regarding promised discounts, resulting in overcharged premiums over several years. - read more