Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE
Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled in favour of QBE Insurance in a case where an uninsured driver attempted to secure compensation following a collision involving a fire truck.
The incident occurred when the QBE-insured driver paused at an intersection to allow a fire truck to pass, leading to the uninsured driver impacting their vehicle.
The uninsured motorist, disputing QBE's decision to hold him responsible and requiring payment for damages, sought redress through AFCA. He claimed the QBE-insurer's customer triggered the incident by stopping abruptly, without warning, following the fire truck's activation of sirens and lights.
Despite lacking dashcam footage, AFCA reviewed a Queensland Fire Department statement suggesting the distraction and subsequent collision were foreseeable due to the fire truck's presence at a blind corner. Although acknowledging that the QBE customer was potentially negligent for stopping suddenly without adequate warning, AFCA maintained the road rules require drivers to maintain a safe distance to prevent such accidents.
The adjudication concluded that a sufficient following distance was lacking, which could have otherwise allowed the uninsured driver to avert the collision, rendering the complaint unsubstantiated for coverage of his damages. Consequently, the tribunal found him responsible for a portion of the crash alongside the QBE-insured driver.
The ruling bars the uninsured from receiving compensation for his vehicle damage, legal fees, or money paid to QBE, citing jurisdiction limits. Yet, it mandated QBE to issue a $500 compensation for originally misleading the uninsured driver with incorrect statements regarding cost bearing.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently opposed Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RAC WA) insurance division. This decision stems from concerns that the merger would significantly reduce competition within Western Australia's insurance market, potentially leading to higher premiums for consumers. - read more
Australia is witnessing a significant increase in mental health-related insurance claims, particularly within superannuation funds. This surge has led to calls for more efficient processing and faster payouts to support individuals facing mental health challenges. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a pivotal report in 2026, emphasising the urgent need for substantial action and investment to shield communities from the increasing impacts of extreme weather events. The Insurance Climate Vulnerability Assessment (ICVA) serves as a stress test, modelling potential future scenarios rather than forecasting specific outcomes. However, the risks outlined are already becoming evident, reinforcing the insurance industry's calls for urgent intervention to mitigate extreme weather risks. - read more
In a significant development for the fitness industry, AUSactive has unveiled a new insurance product specifically designed for exercise and active health professionals. This initiative, developed in partnership with global insurance broker Marsh, aims to provide enhanced protection while offering lower premiums compared to existing market options. - read more