Compare Life Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE

Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE

Uninsured Driver Denied Compensation in Dispute with QBE?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has ruled in favour of QBE Insurance in a case where an uninsured driver attempted to secure compensation following a collision involving a fire truck.
The incident occurred when the QBE-insured driver paused at an intersection to allow a fire truck to pass, leading to the uninsured driver impacting their vehicle.

The uninsured motorist, disputing QBE's decision to hold him responsible and requiring payment for damages, sought redress through AFCA. He claimed the QBE-insurer's customer triggered the incident by stopping abruptly, without warning, following the fire truck's activation of sirens and lights.

Despite lacking dashcam footage, AFCA reviewed a Queensland Fire Department statement suggesting the distraction and subsequent collision were foreseeable due to the fire truck's presence at a blind corner. Although acknowledging that the QBE customer was potentially negligent for stopping suddenly without adequate warning, AFCA maintained the road rules require drivers to maintain a safe distance to prevent such accidents.

The adjudication concluded that a sufficient following distance was lacking, which could have otherwise allowed the uninsured driver to avert the collision, rendering the complaint unsubstantiated for coverage of his damages. Consequently, the tribunal found him responsible for a portion of the crash alongside the QBE-insured driver.

The ruling bars the uninsured from receiving compensation for his vehicle damage, legal fees, or money paid to QBE, citing jurisdiction limits. Yet, it mandated QBE to issue a $500 compensation for originally misleading the uninsured driver with incorrect statements regarding cost bearing.

Published:Friday, 21st Mar 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

ACCC Flags Potential Competition Issues in RACWA's Sale to IAG
ACCC Flags Potential Competition Issues in RACWA's Sale to IAG
04 May 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has expressed significant concerns regarding the proposed acquisition of the Royal Automobile Club of Western Australia's (RACWA) insurance operations by Insurance Australia Group (IAG). The watchdog warns that this transaction could substantially lessen competition in Western Australia's insurance market, potentially leading to higher premiums and reduced options for consumers. - read more
NEOS Elevates Income Protection with Increased Medical-Free Limits
NEOS Elevates Income Protection with Increased Medical-Free Limits
03 May 2026: Paige Estritori
NEOS has recently announced significant enhancements to its income protection offerings, effective from 11 March 2026. Responding to adviser feedback, the insurer has increased the maximum coverage available without mandatory medical examinations, aiming to simplify the application process for Australians seeking income protection insurance. - read more
Acenda Life Enhances Income Protection Policies with Increased Coverage Limits
Acenda Life Enhances Income Protection Policies with Increased Coverage Limits
03 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Acenda Life has recently implemented a series of updates to its Retail Life Insurance portfolio, effective from 11 April 2026. These changes are designed to provide greater flexibility and accessibility for Australians seeking income protection insurance, addressing common concerns about policy limitations and entry age restrictions. - read more
AFCA Supports Insurer's Application of Offset Clause in Income Protection Claim
AFCA Supports Insurer's Application of Offset Clause in Income Protection Claim
03 May 2026: Paige Estritori
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of Nippon Life Insurance in a dispute concerning the application of an offset clause in an income protection (IP) claim. This decision underscores the critical importance of policyholders understanding the specific terms and conditions of their insurance policies. - read more


Life Insurance Articles



Start Here !
life insurance
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

Start Here

Life Cover Amount:
Postcode:


All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.
Knowledgebase
Insurable Interest:
A financial or other kind of interest in the insured item or person, necessary for a valid insurance contract.