ASIC Takes Hollard Insurance to Court Over Significant Claim Handling Issues
ASIC Takes Hollard Insurance to Court Over Significant Claim Handling Issues
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against Hollard Insurance, alleging a breach of the duty of utmost good faith.
This action is in response to what ASIC describes as Hollard's "egregious" handling of a home and contents insurance claim filed by a couple from regional Victoria.
ASIC's case against Hollard revolves around the insurer's handling of the couple's claim following storm damage to their property in October 2021. The regulator claims Hollard's excessive delays and failure to conduct essential make-safe work have rendered the couple's home uninhabitable, leading to extensive moisture, mould, and decay issues that necessitate demolition and rebuilding.
Sarah Court, ASIC's deputy chair, highlighted the seriousness of the delays, stating that such prolonged inaction is unacceptable and potentially unlawful. The legal action aims to address growing concerns about increasing general insurance complaints and send a strong message about the unacceptability of such delays.
The claim, initially filed in October 2021, took Hollard nearly three and a half years to resolve. The insurer rejected the claim in April 2023, 18 months after its submission. Following this, the couple sought intervention from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which directed Hollard to provide compensation for non-financial losses and substantiated the storm as the proximate cause of the damage.
Hollard eventually consented to a cash settlement exceeding $1.5 million. However, ASIC contends that despite initially accepting the claim, Hollard delayed decisions regarding repairs, took over nine months to arrange a structural engineer inspection, and postponed the provision of temporary accommodation.
Responding to the legal action, a Hollard spokesperson acknowledged the proceedings and expressed support for ASIC's efforts in fostering consumer-positive outcomes. They noted Hollard's cooperation with ASIC but refrained from further commenting due to the ongoing nature of the legal matter.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
New Zealand's insurance law reforms are moving from policy debate into practical preparation, and life insurance customers should pay attention. The changes are designed to modernise old insurance rules, improve contract fairness and make the responsibilities of both insurers and consumers easier to understand. For households considering life, trauma, total and permanent disability or income protection cover, the key point is not that applications become less serious. It is that the process should become clearer and more proportionate. - read more
Renewed industry attention on replacement life insurance advice is a timely reminder for New Zealand households: changing policies is not the same as changing a power plan or mobile provider. A cheaper premium can be attractive, especially when household budgets are under pressure, but the real question is whether the new cover protects your family at least as well as the policy being left behind. - read more
Asteron Life’s ownership transition from Suncorp to Resolution Life has put another spotlight on a practical question for New Zealand life insurance customers: what should you do when the company behind your policy changes? For most existing policyholders, an ownership change does not automatically rewrite the promises in a current contract. - read more
Recent industry attention on insurance complaints is a useful reminder that buying life cover is not only about finding the lowest premium. For New Zealand households, the real test of a policy often comes years later, when a claim is made and the insurer checks whether the policy terms have been met. - read more
Choosing a life insurance cover amount is one of the most important parts of arranging a policy. The cover amount, sometimes called the sum insured, is the amount that may be paid to beneficiaries or an estate if a valid life insurance claim is accepted. - read more
Life insurance is a crucial financial safety net, offering monetary support to beneficiaries or an estate upon the death or terminal diagnosis of the insured. In New Zealand, life insurance options differ greatly, with variations in pricing, included features, claim evaluations, and specific conditions. - read more
Life insurance advisers and brokers can help New Zealand consumers compare policies, understand underwriting questions and arrange cover. This guide explains how advice is regulated, what disclosures to expect, how commissions may work and what to do if you have a complaint. - read more
Life insurance is designed to provide a payment if the insured person dies or, in some policies, is diagnosed with a terminal illness and the claim meets the policy terms. For families and beneficiaries, the claims process can occur at a difficult time, so it is important to understand how claims are assessed and what issues may affect whether a claim is paid. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your
privacy.
Knowledgebase
Insurance Deductible: the amount that an insured is required to contribute toward an insurance claim as stipulated in an insurance policy. Otherwise known as the "policy excess".
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.