ASIC Takes Hollard Insurance to Court Over Significant Claim Handling Issues

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against Hollard Insurance, alleging a breach of the duty of utmost good faith.

This action is in response to what ASIC describes as Hollard's "egregious" handling of a home and contents insurance claim filed by a couple from regional Victoria.

ASIC's case against Hollard revolves around the insurer's handling of the couple's claim following storm damage to their property in October 2021. The regulator claims Hollard's excessive delays and failure to conduct essential make-safe work have rendered the couple's home uninhabitable, leading to extensive moisture, mould, and decay issues that necessitate demolition and rebuilding.

Sarah Court, ASIC's deputy chair, highlighted the seriousness of the delays, stating that such prolonged inaction is unacceptable and potentially unlawful. The legal action aims to address growing concerns about increasing general insurance complaints and send a strong message about the unacceptability of such delays.

The claim, initially filed in October 2021, took Hollard nearly three and a half years to resolve. The insurer rejected the claim in April 2023, 18 months after its submission. Following this, the couple sought intervention from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which directed Hollard to provide compensation for non-financial losses and substantiated the storm as the proximate cause of the damage.

Hollard eventually consented to a cash settlement exceeding $1.5 million. However, ASIC contends that despite initially accepting the claim, Hollard delayed decisions regarding repairs, took over nine months to arrange a structural engineer inspection, and postponed the provision of temporary accommodation.

Responding to the legal action, a Hollard spokesperson acknowledged the proceedings and expressed support for ASIC's efforts in fostering consumer-positive outcomes. They noted Hollard's cooperation with ASIC but refrained from further commenting due to the ongoing nature of the legal matter.

Published:Monday, 14th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

HESTA Announces 12% Reduction in Insurance Fees for Members

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

HESTA, a leading Australian superannuation fund, has unveiled a significant reduction in insurance fees, set to take effect from 1 July 2026. This initiative aims to make insurance coverage more accessible and affordable for its members, aligning with the fund's commitment to enhancing member benefits. - read more

AFCA Supports Insurer's Application of Offset Clause in Income Protection Case

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of Nippon Life Insurance in a dispute concerning the application of an offset clause in an income protection (IP) claim. This decision underscores the critical importance of policyholders understanding the specific terms and conditions of their insurance policies. - read more

NEOS Elevates Income Protection with Increased Medical-Free Limits

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

NEOS has recently announced significant enhancements to its income protection offerings, effective from 11 March 2026. Responding to adviser feedback, the insurer has increased the maximum coverage available without mandatory medical examinations, aiming to simplify the application process for Australians seeking income protection insurance. - read more

High Court Decision Alters Liability Landscape for Marine Insurers

19 May 2026: Paige Estritori

In a landmark decision, Australia's High Court has unanimously ruled that marine insurers cannot limit their liability for wreck removal and pollution clean-up claims. This ruling stems from the case involving Standard Club UK Ltd, the protection and indemnity (P&I) insurer for CSL Australia, following a 2022 collision at the Port of Devonport, Tasmania. - read more

Click for more Insurance News

Life Insurance Articles

Start Here !

Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.

Knowledgebase

Grace Period:
A time period after the premium is due during which an insurance policy remains in force even if the premium has not yet been paid.

IMPORTANT: We are neither authorised nor licensed to provide finance or finance products. We do not recommend any specific financial products and we do not offer any form of credit or other financial advice. All product enquiries and requests for financial and/or other advice on this website are referred to third party, qualified intermediaries with whom you can deal directly. We may receive a fee or commission from these third parties in consideration for the referral. Before any action is taken to obtain a product or service referred to by this website, advice should be obtained (from either the third part to whom we refer you or from another qualified intermediary) as to the appropriateness of obtaining those products having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs.