Insurers Mandated to Fulfill Obligations Post Mine Collapse
Insurers Mandated to Fulfill Obligations Post Mine Collapse
Insurance companies have been directed to complete their responsibilities in restoring a critical piece of mine equipment that collapsed following initial repairs. This ruling comes after a legal contention over their payout duties.
Insurance providers Vero, QBE, and Singapore’s Star International Insurance contended that they were not accountable for the failure of a radial coal stacker during post-repair tests. The initial damage was covered under the industrial special risks (ISR) policy, held by Baralaba Coal Company.
The policy had expired by the time the final repair claim was made by the Queensland mine. However, the Federal Court determined that the insurers were still liable as the equipment had not been fully operational when the second failure occurred.
Justice Sarah Derrington, who presided over the case, stated in her ruling, “The additional damage sustained to the stacker after the insurance period concluded is irrelevant. The insurers’ duty to cover the reparation costs took effect during the policy period. Since the stacker was not restored to its pre-damaged state before the second collapse, the obligation persisted.”
The radial coal stacker initially suffered damage in March 2019, a month before the ISR policy expired. The insurers funded the initial repairs by September of that year. The equipment collapsed again in October during performance tests to verify the repairs.
Insurers argued that by October 27, 2019, the stacker was “substantially reinstated,” and the policy had lapsed by then. Therefore, they claimed that they were not required to cover the costs for the damages from the collapse.
In her decision, Justice Derrington refuted this viewpoint.
The insurers also pointed out that Baralaba Coal Company had signed a “form of release” related to the initial payout in June 2020, which they interpreted as absolving them from any subsequent liability from the storm and the collapse.
Justice Derrington countered, stating, “The context surrounding the creation and signing of the document indicates it was meant to settle the amount payable related to the storm damage from March 12, 2019. There’s no reason to believe it also covered the October 27, 2019, collapse.”
The court ruled that the insurers must cover the additional damages and the mine’s legal expenses. For a detailed understanding, you can access the ruling here.
Original article source: Insurance News Magazine.
Published:Tuesday, 25th Jun 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| TAL's Health Sense Plus Now Covers Income Protection 02 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a strategic move to make life insurance more relevant to younger Australians, TAL has expanded its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection policies. This initiative allows advisers to offer clients enhanced value through a straightforward preventative health engagement. - read more |
| APRA Calls for Sustainable Reforms in Income Protection Insurance 02 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has expressed concerns regarding the sustainability of income protection insurance, following significant losses within the industry. Over a five-year period, insurers have reported losses totaling $2.5 billion on this product. - read more |
| HCF Life Recognised for Excellence in Income Protection Insurance 02 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori HCF Life, part of Australia's largest not-for-profit health fund, has been honored with the 'Best for Income Protection Insurance (Direct)' award by WeMoney for the third consecutive year. This accolade underscores HCF Life's commitment to providing competitive and customer-focused insurance products. - read more |
| Significant Drop in Australian Commercial Insurance Rates 02 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In a notable development for Australian businesses, commercial insurance rates have experienced a significant decline. According to Marsh's Global Insurance Market Index, the Australia-Pacific market saw an 8% drop in commercial rates during the fourth quarter of 2024, marking the most substantial decrease globally. - read more |
| Income Protection vs. Total Permanent Disability: Which Is Right for You? Financial security is crucial in today's unpredictable world, where unexpected events can disrupt the stability and comfort of our daily lives. For Australians, protecting one's income and lifestyle from unforeseen circumstances is a key component of personal finance. - read more
|
| Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a safeguard that provides individuals with financial stability in the event they are unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance typically replaces a significant percentage of the insured's income, ensuring that their financial commitments can still be met during periods when they cannot earn an income through employment. - read more
|
| What Hospitality Business Owners Need to Know About Income Protection Insurance The Australian hospitality industry is renowned for its vibrancy, yet it also faces significant challenges. With fluctuating demand, seasonal changes, and unpredictable external factors such as economic downturns and pandemics, hospitality businesses often operate in a high-risk environment. For hotel operators, the stakes are even higher due to substantial investments in property, staff, and customer service. - read more
|
| A Comprehensive Guide to Income Protection Insurance in Australia Income protection insurance is a type of insurance policy that provides financial support if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. It offers a replacement income, usually up to 75% of your normal wage, helping you maintain some level of income during tough times. - read more
|
The individual or entity who owns the insurance policy.