Insurance companies have been directed to complete their responsibilities in restoring a critical piece of mine equipment that collapsed following initial repairs. This ruling comes after a legal contention over their payout duties.
Insurance providers Vero, QBE, and Singapore’s Star International Insurance contended that they were not accountable for the failure of a radial coal stacker during post-repair tests. The initial damage was covered under the industrial special risks (ISR) policy, held by Baralaba Coal Company.
The policy had expired by the time the final repair claim was made by the Queensland mine. However, the Federal Court determined that the insurers were still liable as the equipment had not been fully operational when the second failure occurred.
Justice Sarah Derrington, who presided over the case, stated in her ruling, “The additional damage sustained to the stacker after the insurance period concluded is irrelevant. The insurers’ duty to cover the reparation costs took effect during the policy period. Since the stacker was not restored to its pre-damaged state before the second collapse, the obligation persisted.”
The radial coal stacker initially suffered damage in March 2019, a month before the ISR policy expired. The insurers funded the initial repairs by September of that year. The equipment collapsed again in October during performance tests to verify the repairs.
Insurers argued that by October 27, 2019, the stacker was “substantially reinstated,” and the policy had lapsed by then. Therefore, they claimed that they were not required to cover the costs for the damages from the collapse.
In her decision, Justice Derrington refuted this viewpoint.
The insurers also pointed out that Baralaba Coal Company had signed a “form of release” related to the initial payout in June 2020, which they interpreted as absolving them from any subsequent liability from the storm and the collapse.
Justice Derrington countered, stating, “The context surrounding the creation and signing of the document indicates it was meant to settle the amount payable related to the storm damage from March 12, 2019. There’s no reason to believe it also covered the October 27, 2019, collapse.”
The court ruled that the insurers must cover the additional damages and the mine’s legal expenses. For a detailed understanding, you can access the ruling here.
Original article source: Insurance News Magazine.
Published:Tuesday, 25th Jun 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
| Netstrata's Undisclosed Commissions and Conflicts of Interest Revealed 06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In February 2025, an independent review conducted by McGrathNicol uncovered significant issues within Netstrata, a prominent strata management company. The investigation revealed that Netstrata failed to disclose commissions and did not obtain multiple quotes for services, potentially breaching legal obligations. Additionally, the review identified undisclosed personal relationships between Netstrata employees and suppliers, raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest. - read more |
| NSW Fair Trading Revokes Strata Licences Due to Insurance Failures and Misconduct 06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In May 2025, NSW Fair Trading took decisive action against Result Strata Management Pty Ltd and its General Manager, Michael Lee, by permanently revoking their licences to operate in the state's strata management sector. This move followed an investigation that uncovered multiple breaches of the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002, highlighting significant misconduct within the company. - read more |
| CHU's 2025 Strata Market Report: Stability Amidst Climate and Regulatory Challenges 06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori In November 2025, CHU, Australia's largest strata insurance underwriting agency, released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current trends and challenges within the strata industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium trends, climate-related risks, regulatory developments, and emerging sector challenges. - read more |
| Rising Insurance Costs Amidst Climate Change: What Homeowners Need to Know 06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori Australian homeowners are experiencing significant increases in home insurance premiums, largely due to the escalating risks associated with climate change. Recent analyses reveal a national average premium hike of 14%, translating to an additional $343 annually for policyholders. This trend underscores the growing financial burden on homeowners as extreme weather events become more frequent and severe. - read more |
| Understanding Income Protection Insurance: A Beginner's Guide for Australians Welcome to the essential guide on Income Protection Insurance for Australians. Whether you're just starting out in the workforce or you're well into your career, understanding how to protect your income is crucial. In this beginner-friendly article, we'll explore what income protection insurance is, why it's a vital safeguard for workers, and dive into some real-life scenarios illustrating its importance. - read more
|
| DIY Review Checklist for your Income Protection Insurance If you have an income protection insurance plan already - or are thinking about buying one, then you need to be aware that these policies require regular maintenance and careful scrutiny to ensure that they adequately meet your needs. Unfortunately, many people purchase income protection insurance policies only to find out about their shortcomings at claim time. - read more
|
| Income Protection Insurance vs. Life Insurance: What's the Difference? Insurance is a crucial aspect of financial planning, offering protection against unexpected events that can have significant financial impacts. Among the various insurance options available, two prominent types are Income Protection Insurance and Life Insurance. - read more
|
| How to Compare Income Protection Insurance for Self-Employed Australians For self-employed Australians, the financial stability provided by consistent income is the backbone of both personal and business success. Unlike traditional employees, who might have access to sick leave or employer-sponsored disability benefits, self-employed individuals are solely responsible for their financial security in the event of illness or injury. This is where income protection insurance steps in as a crucial safeguard. - read more
|