Advisers' Levy Driven by New Compliance Costs
Advisers' Levy Driven by New Compliance Costs
The bulk of the additional levy is directed towards the funding of the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR), a mechanism aimed to ensure consumers receive compensation owed by financial firms that have failed. Additionally, costs related to the adviser exam and the creation of a single disciplinary body for advisors add to the financial burden.
Further driving up costs is ASIC’s oversight activities regarding choice superannuation products. This has raised eyebrows within the financial advisory community as to why advisers should bear this specific administrative cost, which arguably involves superannuation funds as a key component of the equation.
ASIC has broken down these costs, itemizing the components being billed to advisors. This includes:
- CSLR implementation
- Choice superannuation products oversight
- Adviser examination and registration
- Compliance for SMSF (Self-Managed Super Funds) establishment advice
- The newly structured single disciplinary body system
Moreover, financial advisers will share additional regulatory costs with other financial advice sub-sectors. These costs encompass several areas including ASIC’s cyber resilience initiatives, breach reporting mechanisms, the employment of artificial intelligence, dispute resolution processes, penalties for the non-lodgement of financial reports, enforcement against unlicensed financial advice, and restrictions on cold-calling for superannuation switching.
Critics argue that the levy structure places an undue financial load on advisers for areas where other stakeholders, such as superannuation funds and accountants, significantly contribute and should possibly share responsibility. For example, the costs associated with SMSF establishment advice compliance are shared more equitably between accountants and advisers, reflecting their respective roles.
On a positive note, costs associated with combating unlicensed financial advice and cold-calling superannuation switching will be distributed across all financial advisory sub-sectors rather than being shouldered solely by individual advisers.
Financial advisers looking to understand the reasoning behind their increased ASIC levy can refer to the detailed breakdown provided by ASIC. According to ASIC's figures, the overall regulation cost for the financial advice sector for 2022-23 sat at $47.6 million, which is poised to rise to $48.4 million in 2023-24.
The need for these measures, while increasing costs in the short term, is part of an effort to create a more robust and fairer financial advisory industry, aiming to benefit consumers and professionals alike by ensuring higher standards and better protection mechanisms.
Source: ASIC Bulletin
Published:Wednesday, 10th Jul 2024
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Australian General Insurers Report Record $7.3 Billion Profit 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance sector has reported a remarkable after-tax profit of $7.3 billion for the last financial year, marking its most substantial earnings in over ten years. This significant increase is primarily attributed to a decrease in catastrophe-related losses and robust investment returns. - read more |
| Australian General Insurance Premiums Set to Surpass $144 Billion by 2029 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The Australian general insurance market is on a trajectory to see direct written premiums (DWP) exceed $144 billion by 2029, according to projections from data and analytics firm GlobalData. This anticipated growth is largely fueled by heightened demand for coverage in response to the increasing frequency of natural disasters. - read more |
| Understanding the Impact of New Regulations on Cosmetic Nurses' Insurance 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori The cosmetic nursing sector in Australia has experienced significant growth, driven by increasing demand for non-surgical cosmetic procedures such as injectables and skin treatments. This expansion has led to heightened scrutiny and the introduction of new regulations aimed at ensuring patient safety and professional accountability. - read more |
| Health Minister Addresses Insurers' Use of Loopholes to Raise Premiums 18 Jan 2026: Paige Estritori In December 2024, Australian Health Minister Mark Butler issued a stern warning to private health insurers regarding the use of 'underhanded' tactics to raise premiums. This statement came in response to findings that some insurers have been closing old policies and introducing more expensive ones, effectively increasing costs for consumers without transparent communication. - read more |
| Loss of income insurance: Case Study Rebecca is a single, self-employed graphic designer who works from home. Aged in her mid-30s, she has monthly commitments of a mortgage and car payments and the usual living expenses. - read more
|
| Income protection insurance It's trite but true to say that, for most people, their most valuable asset is their ability to earn an income. But how relevant is income insurance to most Australians? - read more
|
| Protecting Your Professional Income: Understanding Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a financial safety net for individuals who are unable to work due to illness or injury. It ensures that you receive a percentage of your income during times when you cannot earn a salary, helping you maintain your lifestyle as you recover. This type of insurance offers peace of mind by providing financial support when it is needed most, allowing you to focus on recovery rather than financial pressures. - read more
|
| Everything You Need to Know About Waiting Periods and Income Protection Benefits Income protection insurance is a crucial financial product designed to secure a portion of your income if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. This type of insurance acts as a financial safety net, ensuring that you can maintain your lifestyle and meet essential expenses while recovering. - read more
|
An insurance carrier may reserve the "right of subrogation" in the event of a loss. This means that the company may choose to take action to recover the amount of a claim paid to a covered insured if the loss was caused by a third party.