AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute
AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute
The issue dates back to 2018 when the owners lodged a claim after multiple hydrants were deliberately opened, causing water damage to the lifts. Although the lift manufacturer and maintenance consultants recommended replacing the hoist ropes, Chubb’s assessor did not initially approve this part of the claim.
After a scope of work was agreed upon, the cables were placed on a "watchlist" due to anticipated further deterioration caused by water exposure. In 2019, consultants reiterated concerns of moisture-related damage, urging restoration to the lifts’ original state. Consequently, the replacement work for the hoist ropes was completed in 2020, with the owners claiming the expenses under the initial policy.
Chubb contested the claim, stating that "direct physical damage" from a "sudden and accidental" cause is required for policy application. They argued the cable damage resulted from insufficient lubrication and prolonged use, not the earlier vandalism.
According to Chubb, their appointed consultant found no concrete evidence of water causing damage to the main hoist ropes. However, AFCA’s ruling challenged this stance, citing inconsistencies in the maintenance records and earlier assessments acknowledging water exposure.
The AFCA panel expressed skepticism about Chubb’s theory of overuse leading to the cable damage, finding the insurer’s expert report unsubstantiated by technical or scientific testing. Instead, the ruling recognized the significant water event of 2018 as the probable cause, aligning with the insurable event criteria of the policy.
An AFCA ombudsman articulated doubt over Chubb's exclusions explaining the damage, remarking on the absence of convincing counter-evidence. As the conditions of policy exclusions were not sufficiently proven, AFCA concluded that the water event was the leading cause of damage, fulfilling the policy’s terms.
Published:Friday, 28th Mar 2025
Source: Paige Estritori
Share this news item:
| Allianz and AWP Face Hefty Penalties for Misleading Insurance Claims 01 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori The Supreme Court of New South Wales has imposed significant criminal penalties on Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd and AWP Australia Pty Ltd. Allianz received a $13.5 million fine, while AWP was fined $3.3 million. These penalties were for falsely or misleadingly promoting financial products online, breaching sections 1041E(1) and 1311(1) of the Corporations Act 2001. - read more |
| AFCA Rules in Favour of Owners in Lift Vandalism Dispute 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori In a landmark decision, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has mandated that Chubb Insurance replace the hoist ropes of two lifts in an apartment block, following damage attributed to vandalism. The owners' corporation successfully argued that the damage to the lifts was part of a previously recognized vandalism incident. - read more |
| NSW Government Targets Predatory Practice of Claim Farming 28 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales Government is taking decisive action against 'claim farming', a predatory practice that exploits vulnerable individuals by pressuring them to file compensation claims. This practice often involves unethical tactics targeting susceptible groups, including child abuse survivors. To combat this, the government is set to introduce the Claim Farming Practices Prohibition Bill 2025. - read more |
| RAA Partners with Duck Creek for Major Tech Overhaul 27 Mar 2025: Paige Estritori The Royal Automobile Association (RAA), a leading motoring group in South Australia, is set to revamp its technology infrastructure by adopting Duck Creek's OnDemand cloud platform. This strategic transition will see RAA's outdated systems for motor and home insurance transformed to include streamlined policy, rating, billing, and claims management, as well as enhanced data handling and insights capabilities. - read more |
| Navigating Pre-existing Conditions in Income Protection Insurance Income protection insurance is a safety net that many Australians rely on to secure their financial future in the event of illness or injury preventing them from working. It's a type of policy that provides a replacement income if you are unable to earn your regular income due to a health-related absence from the workplace. - read more
|
| Dispelling the Myths: Why Income Protection is More Accessible Than You Think Income protection insurance serves as a financial safety net, designed to support individuals in the event that they are unable to work due to illness or injury. The significance of this type of insurance lies in its ability to provide a continuation of income during tough times, ensuring that one's financial responsibilities are taken care of. - read more
|
| Covering the Unexpected: A Guide to Trauma Insurance for Australian Families Trauma insurance, also known as critical illness insurance, is a type of coverage that provides a lump sum payment in the event that the insured suffers from a critical illness or injury. Unlike health insurance, which covers medical expenses, trauma insurance is designed to provide financial protection by helping to cover the additional costs associated with recovery from a severe illness or injury. - read more
|
| Busting the Myth That Income Protection is Only for Physical Injuries To all the self-employed Australians! You're the backbone of our economy, recognized for your entrepreneurial spirit and abilities to navigate the unique challenges of managing your own business. Yet, with great freedom comes great responsibility, particularly when it comes to securing your financial well-being. - read more
|
The amount you will have to contribute when you make a claim.