Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.

Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.

This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Rising Professional Indemnity Claims in Australia's Financial Services Industry

30 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian financial services sector is currently witnessing a significant increase in professional indemnity (PI) insurance claims. This trend is largely attributed to intensified regulatory scrutiny and recent legal actions initiated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). - read more

Sterling Insurance Enhances Professional Indemnity Offerings with New Lloyd's Binding Authority

30 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Sterling Insurance has recently secured a new professional indemnity (PI) binding authority with Lloyd's, a development that promises to provide Australian brokers with greater control over product offerings and pricing structures. This strategic move is part of Sterling's ongoing commitment to delivering tailored insurance solutions that meet the specific needs of niche and complex risk sectors. - read more

Mandatory Professional Indemnity Insurance for NSW Builders Effective July 2026

30 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

Starting 1 July 2026, builders in New South Wales (NSW) who engage in design-related activities will be required to hold professional indemnity (PI) insurance. This mandate is part of the Design and Building Practitioners Act (DBP Act), which aims to enhance accountability and quality within the construction industry. - read more

Navigating the Rise in Strata Insurance Premiums: Causes and Solutions

30 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In recent years, many Australian strata property owners have faced significant increases in insurance premiums, with some experiencing hikes of 40-80% since 2022. Understanding the underlying causes of these increases is crucial for developing effective strategies to manage and mitigate costs. - read more

Click for more Insurance News

Life Insurance Articles

Start Here !

Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.

Knowledgebase

Professional indemnity:
An insurance that provides cover for liability incurred in the course of exercising a profession.

IMPORTANT: We are neither authorised nor licensed to provide finance or finance products. We do not recommend any specific financial products and we do not offer any form of credit or other financial advice. All product enquiries and requests for financial and/or other advice on this website are referred to third party, qualified intermediaries with whom you can deal directly. We may receive a fee or commission from these third parties in consideration for the referral. Before any action is taken to obtain a product or service referred to by this website, advice should be obtained (from either the third part to whom we refer you or from another qualified intermediary) as to the appropriateness of obtaining those products having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs.