Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Direct vs Broker: What Youi’s SME Insurance Shift Means

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Youi’s latest comments to the federal parliamentary inquiry into small business insurance have put a practical question back in front of Australian sole traders and small operators: is cheaper, simpler direct insurance always better, or does advice still matter when business risks become more complex? - read more

Tax Audit Cover Demand Rises as ATO Focus Sharpens

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian small business owners are showing growing interest in tax audit insurance as the Australian Taxation Office increases compliance attention across several sectors, including professional services. For freelancers, consultants and sole traders, the trend is a timely reminder that tax administration is not just a bookkeeping task; it is a business risk that can create real financial pressure if an enquiry lands at the wrong time. - read more

What a Softer Insurance Market Could Mean for Personal Trainers

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s commercial insurance market has moved into a more favourable phase for many business buyers in the first half of 2026, with industry reporting pointing to stronger insurer appetite, broader capacity and easing pressure across several key classes. For personal trainers, fitness instructors and small studio operators, the message is not that cover is suddenly simple or cheap. - read more

What the Lead Generation Crackdown Could Mean for Life Cover

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A fresh policy debate is emerging over how Australians are introduced to financial products, including life insurance. The Federal Government has been considering tighter controls on lead generation after concerns about poor conduct in parts of the financial services market, including the collapses of Shield and First Guardian. The life insurance sector is now warning that an overly broad crackdown could unintentionally make it harder for everyday households to find suitable cover. - read more

Click for more Insurance News