Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.

Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.

This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Record Complaints Highlight Challenges in Australian Insurance Claims Processing

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry is currently facing an unprecedented surge in consumer complaints, primarily due to delays in processing claims. This development underscores significant challenges within the sector, particularly affecting tradespeople and small business owners who depend on timely claim resolutions to maintain their operations. - read more

Assessing the Impact of Market Consolidation on Australian Insurance Competition

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian insurance industry has undergone significant consolidation in recent years, leading to concerns about reduced competition and its potential impact on consumers, particularly tradespeople and small business owners who rely on diverse and competitive insurance options. - read more

Australian Senate Prohibits Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance Underwriting

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Senate has recently passed legislation that prohibits life insurers from using genetic test results in their underwriting processes. This landmark decision aims to protect consumers from potential discrimination based on their genetic information and to ensure fairness in the assessment of life insurance policies. - read more

Government Steps In to Secure Fertiliser Supply for Australian Farmers

29 Apr 2026: Paige Estritori

In response to global supply chain disruptions affecting fertiliser availability, the Australian government has partnered with chemical companies CSBP and Incitec Pivot to ensure a steady supply for the nation's farmers. This initiative comes amid challenges posed by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for global trade, which has led to increased prices and uncertainty in the fertiliser market. - read more

Click for more Insurance News

Life Insurance Articles

Start Here !

Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.

Knowledgebase

Claim Adjuster:
An insurance professional who investigates and evaluates insurance claims to determine the amount the insurance company should pay.

IMPORTANT: We are neither authorised nor licensed to provide finance or finance products. We do not recommend any specific financial products and we do not offer any form of credit or other financial advice. All product enquiries and requests for financial and/or other advice on this website are referred to third party, qualified intermediaries with whom you can deal directly. We may receive a fee or commission from these third parties in consideration for the referral. Before any action is taken to obtain a product or service referred to by this website, advice should be obtained (from either the third part to whom we refer you or from another qualified intermediary) as to the appropriateness of obtaining those products having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs.