Compare Life Insurance :: News
SHARE

Share this news item!

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up?w=400

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank.
Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling - supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy - the claim was later denied.
This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Rate this article

0 Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Insurance News

NorthStandard's 5% P&I Premium Increase: What It Means for Marine Insurers
NorthStandard's 5% P&I Premium Increase: What It Means for Marine Insurers
27 May 2026: Paige Estritori
NorthStandard, a prominent global marine insurer, has announced a 5% increase in Protection and Indemnity (P&I) premiums, effective from 20 February 2026. This decision reflects the company's response to ongoing market unpredictability and associated risks. - read more
High Court Decision Eliminates Liability Cap for Wreck Removal Claims
High Court Decision Eliminates Liability Cap for Wreck Removal Claims
27 May 2026: Paige Estritori
In a landmark decision, Australia's High Court has unanimously ruled that Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurers cannot limit their liability for wreck removal and pollution clean-up claims. This ruling emerged from the case involving Standard Club UK Ltd, the P&I insurer for CSL Australia, following a 2022 collision at the Port of Devonport, Tasmania. - read more
Cyclone Narelle's Impact on Marine Insurance in Northern Australia
Cyclone Narelle's Impact on Marine Insurance in Northern Australia
27 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Severe Tropical Cyclone Narelle, which struck Northern Australia in March 2026, has brought to the forefront the escalating challenges in securing marine hull insurance in regions like Northern Queensland and Western Australia. The cyclone's path, impacting both the Northern Territory and the northwest of Western Australia, exemplifies the increasing volatility of weather patterns and their profound implications for the marine insurance sector. - read more
Vero's 2026 SME Insurance Index Uncovers Critical Risk Management Gaps in Australian Small Businesses
Vero's 2026 SME Insurance Index Uncovers Critical Risk Management Gaps in Australian Small Businesses
27 May 2026: Paige Estritori
Vero's recently released 2026 SME Insurance Index has brought to light significant disparities in risk management practices between small and large Australian businesses. The survey, encompassing over 1,500 enterprises, underscores the pressing need for enhanced risk strategies among small and micro businesses to bolster their resilience in an increasingly volatile economic landscape. - read more


Life Insurance Articles



Start Here !
life insurance
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!

Start Here

Life Cover Amount:
Postcode:


All quotes are provided free and without obligation. We respect your privacy.
Knowledgebase
Incontestability Clause:
A provision in a life insurance policy that prevents the insurer from voiding coverage due to a misstatement by the insured after a certain period.