Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The policyholder argued that according to the product disclosure statement (PDS), only "incorrect fuel usage" was excluded, and as AdBlue is technically not a fuel, her claim should be valid. Additional grievances arose after alleging the insurer’s tow service inflicted further damage to her car, necessitating a new steering rack and wheel realignment.

Suncorp acknowledged the issue with its initial claim rejection, where the decision was based solely on the original PDS. However, the insurer pointed to a supplementary product disclosure statement (SPDS), which explicitly excludes coverage for damage resulting from using fluids not recommended by the vehicle's manufacturer. This key differentiation was reportedly communicated to the policyholder during her policy renewal.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) sided with Suncorp, determining that the insurer did not mislead the customer about her claim status. While Suncorp admitted to referencing outdated PDS wording initially, AFCA deemed their reliance on the updated SPDS appropriate and found no obligation for the insurer to cover the incident. Additionally, AFCA found limited evidence to support the policyholder's accusations regarding damage caused by the towing service, reinforcing Suncorp's account of a winched, non-dragged vehicle recovery.

Despite these rulings, AFCA ordered Suncorp to compensate the policyholder $3000 for delay-induced inconveniences during the claim process, which left her without her vehicle for an extended period, citing the resulting undue stress and hassle.

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of policy amendments, emphasizing the role supplemental documents play during insurance assessments. Consumers are reminded to review documentation thoroughly during renewals to grasp the full scope of their insurance protections and exclusions.

Published:Wednesday, 16th Apr 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

What Broker Breach Reporting Means for Fitness Professionals

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

New broker compliance data has put a spotlight on an issue that matters to every fitness professional who relies on public liability, professional indemnity or broader business insurance: renewal timing and communication. On 18 June 2026, Insurance Business reported that the Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee`s 2025 Annual Data Report recorded 5,417 breaches of the Insurance Brokers Code of Practice affecting 14,842 clients. - read more

Late Insurance Renewals Put Consultant Cover in the Spotlight

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian consultants rely on timely, accurate insurance renewals to keep professional indemnity, public liability and other business covers aligned with current contracts. A recent annual compliance update from the insurance broking sector has underlined why renewal discipline matters: missed or late renewal contact was reported as the leading category of broker code breaches for the past year. - read more

Why GIS Project Tracking Matters for Construction Insurance

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Build Australia’s latest construction technology coverage, published on 16 June 2026, highlights how geographic information systems, or GIS, are moving beyond digital mapping to become a practical project tracking tool for modern construction sites. The report frames GIS as a way to connect dispersed teams, complex schedules, site conditions and operational data into a shared spatial view, helping project leaders make faster and better-informed decisions. - read more

Sphere Liquidation Highlights Why Broker Due Diligence Matters

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The liquidation of authorised representative network Sphere Insurance Group has put broker governance and client continuity back under the spotlight. According to early estimates reported by Insurance News, the failed network could owe more than $11 million to creditors, including insurers, underwriting agencies and a secured lender. The figures are preliminary and based on company records, with the liquidator still investigating the group’s financial position. - read more

Click for more Insurance News