AFCA Upholds Policyholder's Claim, Dismisses Fraud Allegation in Car Theft Case

1

The case began when the claimant's car was stolen from a train station in September 2023. The police later recovered the burnt-out vehicle and apprehended a suspect with a history of vehicle thefts. Despite this, Auto & General Services rejected the claimant's coverage request, citing potential deceit. Their concerns centered on the claimant's financial struggles with overdue loan repayments and the insinuation that the theft might have been orchestrated.

The insurance company's investigation relied heavily on a forensic locksmith's assessment, suggesting the car was accessed using a legitimate key, as the car’s security features should have thwarted unauthorized entry. However, the locksmith found no evidence that the provided keys had duplicates. The insurer thus presumed the theft required a legitimate key, igniting suspicions of the claimant's involvement.

Despite these challenges, the claimant maintained his innocence, attributing his financial woes to his job loss after the theft, which had left him without the means to clear his vehicle loan. AFCA reviewed the evidence and contested the insurer's assertions, noting a lack of any proven connection between the claimant and the arrested thief.

AFCA criticized Auto & General's failure to allow the locksmith to examine the vehicle directly and questioned the conclusion that only a legitimate key could have been used in the theft. The investigation did not sufficiently justify its reliance on circumstantial reasoning without concrete evidence.

In its findings, AFCA determined there was no compelling evidence implicating the claimant in the theft or fraud. Consequently, Auto & General was instructed to honour the insurance claim and compensate the claimant with an additional $2000 for the distress caused by the delays and allegations.

This outcome raises significant concerns about the insurer's investigative procedures and evidentiary standards. AFCA noted Auto & General's dependence on conjecture without pursuing avenues that might have substantiated the claimant's account, indicating a need for insurers to rigorously substantiate fraud allegations before proceeding with denials.

The ruling underscores the importance of transparent and fair practices in the insurance industry, reminding insurers of their obligations to back assertions with clear evidence and address claims impartially.

Published:Monday, 19th May 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Envest Group Unveils TLI Underwriting for Heavy Motor Fleets 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori Envest Group, a prominent player in Australia's insurance sector, has announced the launch of TLI Underwriting, a new agency dedicated to providing specialised insurance solutions for heavy motor fleet operators. This strategic move aims to address the unique challenges faced by larger transport businesses in Australia. - read more

AFCA Directs AIA to Pay Truck Driver's TPD Benefit After Decade-Long Dispute 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In a significant ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), insurance provider AIA has been directed to pay a total and permanent disability (TPD) benefit to a truck driver, concluding a protracted dispute that spanned over a decade. - read more

ICA Proposes Reforms to Reduce Insurance Costs in Queensland 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has recently submitted a series of recommendations to the Queensland Productivity Commission, aiming to address escalating insurance costs and bolster housing resilience across the state. These proposals are particularly pertinent to tradespeople, who are integral to the construction and maintenance of Queensland's housing infrastructure. - read more

NSW Builders Advised to Obtain Professional Indemnity Insurance Before 2026 13 Nov 2025: Paige Estritori In light of recent legislative changes, BizCover is urging registered building practitioners in New South Wales (NSW) to secure professional indemnity (PI) insurance well ahead of the July 1, 2026 compliance deadline. This advisory follows the extension of the enforcement date under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2021, which now mandates that builders hold PI insurance deemed sufficient to cover potential liabilities. - read more